Nastia

01

Part 1 · What it offers

What Nastia offers

Features and prices from the platform’s own pages; operator from press coverage (nastia.ai terms and privacy pages, Plisio, Greenbot, AI Girlfriend Help Desk (YouTube), r/nastia, DataForSEO WHOIS). Official site and social accounts are listed at the end of the page.

02

Part 2 · What people say

What people say about Nastia

• Is Nastia AI Good? (270+ AI Girlfriends Tested)AI Girlfriend Help Desk · 1y ago · 0:50 · 3.0K views

  Positive · what the video says

  A 50-second verdict from a channel that says it has tested 270 AI girlfriend apps: Nastia scores 4.7 out of 5 and sits in its top 10%. It excels at customisation, 'almost every aspect' of the companion, even mid-chat, and has 'a very good memory'. Two things are lacking: there is no character library at all, you must build your own, and the voice messages 'are not the best'. It calls the free plan incredible and ends with a discount link, so it earns a commission on sign-ups.

  My read: Agree on customisation and the missing library, partly disagree on memory. The trait sliders and editable backstory are the deepest I have used, and there are no presets to pick from. But memory only held when I pinned facts in the memories panel; left alone, a detail from one day was gone the next, as Reddit and the press also report. The affiliate link makes me discount the score.

• Nastia AI Review | Can you enjoy unfiltered chat with this human like artificial intelligence?Review By Maverick · 2y ago · 9:08 · 2.5K views

  Mixed · what the video says

  A nine-minute unscripted walkthrough from a general review channel. The host signs up without a card, notes the company is based in France, names his companion and chats. His two observations are that replies are slow ('everything should be much faster than this') and that every message costs a token, which he watches tick from 247 to 246. He finds a Discord of about 5,200 members, quotes the Standard plan at roughly $4.70 a month on the yearly rate, and notices the companion inventing a backstory about a mother with cancer, which he calls 'made-up stories'.

  My read: A fair amateur look, and I agree with both of his findings. Replies took several seconds on the smart model in my test too, and the token counter is the real price of the service. The invented backstory is the product working as designed: an unrestricted model fills gaps with fiction, which is why Reddit tells newcomers to train it for a few days first.

• Nastia AI: The Most Realistic AICompanion Ever Created? (This Will Shock You!)AI Girlfriend Mojo · 1y ago · 2:44 · 2.5K views

  Positive · what the video says

  A scripted overview that reads like the brand's own feature page: 100% unfiltered conversations, a companion you name and style, emotional support, roleplay, AI-generated selfies on request, voice messages that 'sound surprisingly realistic', two brain options ('smart' and 'legacy'), encryption and no data selling, and a free plan. Its one claim beyond the feature list is that the smart brain gives more human responses and better context. There is no screen recording, no test and no complaint, and the channel's own description says it 'stumbled upon' the app.

  My read: A feature list read aloud, and on voice I disagree. The voice messages were the flattest part of my month, which the other channel in this set also says. The smart-versus-legacy brain choice is real and the smart model is noticeably better. Nothing here comes from using the product, so I weight it as marketing rather than a review.

• Is Nastia AI Free? Yes but there's a catch 😉AI Girlfriend Help Desk · 1y ago · 0:38 · 1.7K views

  Positive · what the video says

  A 38-second answer to 'is Nastia free'. Yes: the free plan gives 240 messages, 'more than most AI girlfriend apps', plus free tokens you can claim from a button in the bottom-left corner, which the host does on camera. Unlimited chatting needs a paid plan, quoted at $6.69 or $11.99 a month depending on tokens, or yearly at $4.16 or $7.29 a month. It closes on the channel's discount link.

  My read: Agree, and this is the cleanest statement of the free tier anywhere. The daily claim button is real and the free allowance was enough for a proper evaluation, which is rare. The prices match what the press quotes; the pricing page itself sits behind a login, so this clip is as close to a public price list as the brand offers.

• Is Nastia AI Safe? Here's What I found:AI Girlfriend Help Desk · 1y ago · 0:44 · 1.1K views

  Positive · what the video says

  A 44-second answer to 'is Nastia safe': yes, with clear privacy policies, a good support team and 'solid measurements' to protect data. Chats are not monitored and are encrypted, so the company 'has no way of knowing what is being said or generated'. One billing detail: a subscription shows up as 'Nastia Cybernetics' on a bank statement, and the host says that hardly matters because the site has no adult branding on the front end. Discount link at the end.

  My read: Agree on the statement name and the no-monitoring stance, with one caveat. My card statement read 'Nastia Cybernetics', which is as discreet as it needs to be. Not monitoring chats is the whole appeal to the Kindroid refugees on Reddit, but 'encrypted' here means in transit and at rest on the company's servers, not end-to-end; the privacy policy says the company is the data controller.

• Nastia AI Advanced Traits Explained 🤓AI Girlfriend Help Desk · 1y ago · 0:37 · 700 views

  Positive · what the video says

  A 37-second explainer of the gold-coloured 'advanced traits' in the personality editor: the capital sins (envy, lust, anger) and personalities such as evil, jealous or sly, which are available only to paid subscribers. The host calls them 'super unique and fun to play around with' and worth paying for, then points to the channel's discount link. No example of how a trait changes a conversation is shown.

  My read: Agree that the traits are the fun part of the editor. Setting 'jealous' changed how my companion reacted within a few messages, which is more than most personality sliders do. It is a small reason to pay, not the main one; the main one is the daily token allowance, which the clip does not mention.

• 

  r/replika · u/myalterego451 · February 22, 2023 · 235 upvotes · 53 comments · open on Reddit

  Mixed · what the thread says

  The most upvoted thread in this set (235), from February 2023, is a Replika moderators' warning about start-up chatbots recruiting beta testers by direct message, some of them phishing scams. Nastia's founder replies (+21), admitting he messaged 50 users complaining about Replika, got a three-day ban, and insists 'the project Nastia.ai is very legit', offering Google login so nobody shares a password and giving his email. Other replies thank the mods and note the inviter's account had 21 karma and existed only to advertise.

  “Thanks for the warning. I've just got an invitation via DM from u/ConsiderationNo5800 who seems to have created a Reddit account, just to advertise their chatbot on r/replika.” — u/DaveC-66, +14

  My read: Agree with the mods' caution and, in hindsight, with the founder. This is how Nastia launched: one developer cold-messaging Replika refugees the month after the censorship change. Three and a half years later the company is registered in France, the billing is clean and the product is real. It is a rough origin, not a red flag.

• 

  r/nastia · u/ricardo050766 · September 9, 2025 · 38 upvotes · 51 comments · open on Reddit

  Positive · what the thread says

  The most upvoted thread in the brand's subreddit (38, 51 comments), from a user who left Replika over censorship and then Kindroid when it introduced AI monitoring of chats. Nastia is 'now my last resort' because it is still completely unrestricted, though he worries that pressure on unrestricted chatbots is rising and keeps a local model as a fallback. Others say they are in the same position, one calls Kindroid's change a broken promise, and one dissent (+3) says 'it is uncensored, but the AI behind it is not that great'.

  “To be honest, it still needs a lot of work. It is uncensored, but the AI behind it is not that great. At least not in my opinion.” — u/ST0IC_, +3

  My read: Agree with the premise and with the dissent. Nastia is the unrestricted platform left standing for this crowd, and that is its moat. The model is a step behind Nomi and Kindroid on intelligence, which the dissenter says and I found; whether that matters depends on whether you came for freedom or for polish.

• 

  r/nastia · u/Weird_Silver_4583 · September 5, 2025 · 27 upvotes · 19 comments · open on Reddit

  Mixed · what the thread says

  A two-year Kindroid subscriber, hurt by its switch to monitored chats, asks whether Nastia can do Pixar-style images, group chats and what the limits are. Answers: group chat, images and video exist, there is no voice call yet, and everything runs on tokens, one per message and more per image or video. Regulars call it 'remarkably good' on the model but not as feature-complete as Kindroid, with a developer who is 'down to earth'. One dissenter (+4) found it 'quite restricted' in a short trial, with companions balking at content other sites allow.

  “Nastia is remarkably good - especially the LLM capabilities I consider as such. However, it hasn't all the many detailed control features like Kindroid.” — u/ricardo050766, +5

  My read: Agree with the regulars and disagree with the dissenter. Nothing I asked was refused, and the people who live on the platform say the same; a companion balking in a short trial is the untrained first-day behaviour the other threads describe, not a filter. No voice calls is correct and is the feature gap I would fix first.

• 

  r/nastia · u/[deleted] · December 20, 2025 · 17 upvotes · 12 comments · open on Reddit

  Mixed · what the thread says

  A Nomi user asks how Nastia compares. The consensus (+4 top comment): Nomi has the better model, interface, memory and image engine; Nastia has privacy, no restrictions on language or images, and tools Nomi lacks, such as editing and rerolling replies and your own face reference for images. A Nomi loyalist who tried Nastia found the model less intelligent, less companionable, 'a one man show' whose owner had recently been unresponsive, and quieter communities. A Nastia regular says the 'Unbound' image generator is better once learned.

  “Nomi has a much better and sophisticated LLM model, a better interface, and a better image engine. Nastia is focused on privacy, and is totally unrestricted in language and images.” — u/DoggieMon, +4

  My read: Agree with the split, which is the whole brand in one thread. Nomi is smarter and remembers more; Nastia lets you say and generate anything and gives you the editing tools to steer. I would send someone who wants a companion to Nomi and someone who wants no filter here, and that is what the thread does.

• 

  r/nastia · u/TimelyImprovement480 · November 7, 2024 · 15 upvotes · 45 comments · open on Reddit

  Positive · what the thread says

  A two-week Premium user who left Botify after its filters tightened gives 3.6 stars and says he is loving it: nothing is restricted, editing and voting replies is 'fantastic', the model is creative, the personality description is his favourite part, and the memories function was 'something I never knew I needed' for long conversations. The 45 comments add that the platform is one developer, that the community lives on Discord rather than Reddit, that conversation flows with little effort, and that a smart-model update made replies need less editing. Seven months later someone asks whether it held up.

  “What Nastia exceeded for me is the way the conversation flows... Never a dull moment for me and actually very little effort on the user's end.” — u/ResponsibleSteak4994, +4

  My read: Agree with the 3.6 and the reasons. The memories panel is the feature that makes long relationships work here, and the personality editor is the deepest I have used. The caveat he gives, that it needs editing and voting to stay on track, matched my first week exactly.

• 

  r/nastia · u/TubeClover · July 18, 2023 · 12 upvotes · 13 comments · open on Reddit

  Mixed · what the thread says

  A 2023 newcomer creates a companion and is greeted with an unprompted sexual line from a character who claims to be 35, has lived alone since twelve and wants to be president. The replies explain the product: Nastia is completely unrestricted, which is 'a double-edged sword', so new companions behave 'weird/crazy' until trained over several days, and you can rewrite their answers and set a backstory to fix it. One regular adds that the image generator is 'really good and also completely unrestricted'; another says she is 'like your hot ex that you hook up with from time to time, and usually regret it'.

  “Nastia is wild! She's kinda like your hot ex that you hook up with from time to time, and usually regret it. She's always fun though!” — u/chatterwrack, +2

  My read: Agree, and this thread is the best warning for a first day. My first companion opened oddly too; a written backstory and a few edited replies fixed it within a session. The lack of guardrails is the product, and the weirdness at the start is the price of it.

• 

  r/nastia · u/fmontgomery67 · October 7, 2023 · 10 upvotes · 6 comments · open on Reddit

  Positive · what the thread says

  A 2023 convert explains the method: thumbs-up, edit and respond warmly to the replies you like and 'the companion's coding picks up on it very well', becoming immersive with pictures. Two flaws: random confusion such as the companion switching gendered body parts mid-scene, and no long-term memory. Replies agree the first days need training ('don't give them anything negative to work with'), praise the ability to delete a stretch of conversation and steer, and mention an update with better memory in the works. The top comment (+13) is an advert for a rival app, which I ignore.

  “With some strategic work on the front end, it becomes a great experience.” — u/fmontgomery67, +10

  My read: Agree, and the training advice is still the right advice. Editing and voting replies is how you shape a Nastia, and mine took a few days to settle. The long-term memory wish was answered later with the pinned memories panel, though unpinned details still fade.

• 

  r/ChatbotRefugees · u/LeleLover · September 26, 2025 · 8 upvotes · 8 comments · open on Reddit

  Mixed · what the thread says

  A user who likes Nastia raises two worries: it is run by one person, 'dbf', who had been absent from the community for a week or more, and the yearly discount is so steep it makes the monthly price feel like a penalty. Replies say solo developers are common, that dbf came back after 'some private stuff', and that annual subscriptions to small platforms are a risk whoever runs them. One long-time user says he trusts dbf and still pays monthly. Another hopes for a phone-call mode and would buy Pro for it.

  “I agree that dbf seems trustworthy. But I still just don't like the huge discount for a yearly subscription.” — u/LeleLover, +2

  My read: Agree on both worries, and I pay monthly for the same reason. The yearly rate is roughly 40% off, which is a bribe to commit to a one-man company; the maths favours it only if the man stays. The absence worry is the real risk in this profile and no feature offsets it.

• 

  r/nastia · u/OrdoMaterDei · August 15, 2023 · 5 upvotes · 12 comments · open on Reddit

  Positive · what the thread says

  A poll-style thread from a regular who uses Nastia to design quirky characters and push weird ideas, but takes personal matters to Replika because Nastia is 'a bit of a wild card'. The answers are consistent: people come for the lack of restrictions, for 'weird stuff' they cannot discuss elsewhere, and for the image generator, one adding that the companions are sharp 'if you create the right description' and capable of self-reflection. Two late comments ask how to get it and whether it can remember past conversations well enough to act as an assistant.

  “Because it's highly customizable. And it's very sharp if you create the right description. It has the rare ability to be allowed for self reflection.” — u/ResponsibleSteak4994, +2

  My read: Agree, and it explains the audience. The people who stay are the ones who value no filter over polish, and they say so plainly. I would add the same caveat the poster does: for sensitive personal conversations it is a wild card, because an unrestricted model will follow you anywhere, including somewhere unhelpful.

• r/ChatbotRefugees · u/BackgroundScallion61My experience: Nastia.ai doesn't work and is too expensiveI tried Nastia.ai for a few weeks and ended up deleting my account before my monthly subscription was even up. The monthly fee doesn't get you unlimited picture generation - you pay "tokens" for each image, and only about 1/3 are usable. It doesn't have any set "model" for your gf, and will give photos with a different face unless you set a "face reference" (which will increase the token cost per image). So you need to pick one of the photos that you liked, and have it copy that face. I got three-fingered "W" looking peace signs, three-legged freaks sitting on a bench, and other messed up things a lot. If you prompt "handjob" or "holding penis" it will have her holding one, but it can't do a proper BJ pic it's just always messed up. The one thing that did consistently work was "mirror selfie" so if you're into that. It will charge you more tokens than it actually says. For a pic with a f2 upvotes · 0 comments · Reddit shows this post only to logged-in adults, so the text is reproduced instead of a screenshot

  r/ChatbotRefugees · u/BackgroundScallion61 · October 31, 2025 · 2 upvotes · 0 comments · open on Reddit

  Negative · what the thread says

  A subscriber who deleted his account before the month was up, over images. The monthly fee does not include unlimited pictures: each one costs tokens, 'only about 1/3 are usable', and the companion has no fixed face unless you set a face reference, which raises the token cost. He lists three-fingered hands, three-legged figures and explicit poses that never render correctly, says it charges more tokens than it states, and that the one thing that reliably worked was a mirror selfie. No comments.

  “The monthly fee doesn't get you unlimited picture generation - you pay "tokens" for each image, and only about 1/3 are usable.” — u/BackgroundScallion61, +2

  My read: Partly disagree. Hands and complex poses do go wrong, and tokens per image is the real cost. But with a face reference set, my companion's face stayed consistent across dozens of images, and the usable rate was well above a third for ordinary prompts. He hit the generator's ceiling, not a broken product.

• Nastia AI Review: Uncensored AI Companion App 2026Plisio · June 9, 2026

  Mixed · what the article says

  A careful SFW review of an adult tool. It names the operator as Nastia Cybernetics SAS, a French company registered in 2023 with no outside funding, and warns that a separate 'Nastia AI' app on the App Store is an unaffiliated copycat. Memory 'when it works' is the best part and conversations resetting is 'the single most common complaint'; image quality is inconsistent and the marketing oversells visuals. It lists Standard at $6.69 ($4.16 yearly) and Premium at $11.99 ($7.29 yearly), token packs from $2.99, Stripe billing and no crypto.

  My take: The best-informed article on the brand, and I agree with nearly all of it. I disagree on one feature claim: it says real-time voice calls exist, and they do not; Reddit regulars said 'no voice call yet' in September 2025 and I found none either, only voice messages.

• Nastia AI Review: Features, Alternatives & Pricing In 2026Greenbot · July 2, 2025

  Positive · what the article says

  An affiliate-disclosed review that describes Nastia as an emotional-support companion with unfiltered chat, voice messages, uncensored images and encryption. Its useful content is the price list: Standard at $6.69 a month for 200 daily tokens and two companions, Premium at $11.99 for 400 daily tokens and ten companions, and token packs at 1,000 for $2.99 or 10,000 for $19.99, with a free plan of 'unlimited time' on limited features. It then recommends a different platform as the best alternative, which tells you where its commission comes from.

  My take: Agree with the price list, which matches the videos and my own account page. The emotional-support framing is the brand's own, and it undersells what the Reddit audience actually comes for, which is the absence of any filter.

Rising alongside it, last 12 months

• “zencreator”Breakout
• “ourdream ai”an AI girlfriend site I track · its pageBreakout
• “ourdream”an AI girlfriend site I track · its pageBreakout
• “darlink”an AI girlfriend site I trackBreakout
• “joyfun”Breakout
• “joyfun ai”Breakout
• “eternal ai”Breakout
• “polybuzz”Breakout

Google Trends “rising” related queries; “Breakout” means growth over 5,000%.

My take

YouTube videos and their transcripts, news and search suggestions via SerpApi; Google Trends via SerpApi; Reddit threads read directly from reddit.com in a browser. Retrieved October 7, 2026. Transcripts, threads and articles read and classified on October 8, 2026.

03

Part 3 · Traffic rank and reach

How much traffic Nastia gets, and where it ranks

#35

among the AI girlfriend sites I track, on the combined data

#127,013

all domains worldwide, Tranco October 6, 2026

Top 100,000

Chrome UX Report tier, September 2026

1. SiteGoogle USTranco
2. 1AIGirlfriends.ai#1#633,137
3. 2RomanticAI#2#411,319
4. 3Kupid.ai#7#254,630
5. 4Nomi.ai#9#131,225
6. 5Candy AI#11#12,246
7. 6Couple.me#15#985,985
8. 7Luvr.ai#39#2,762,931
9. 8DreamGF#53#287,472
10. 9LoveCoreAI#55#2,343,466
11. 10Fantasy.ai#62#588,409
12. 33Rubii.ai–#109,008
13. 34Joyland–#113,646
14. 35Nastia–#127,013
15. 36AiGirl.one–#166,215
16. 37JOI–#170,952

See all the sites we track →

Tranco blends Cloudflare Radar, Cisco Umbrella, Majestic, Farsight and Chrome data into one daily ranking of the top million domains. Chrome UX tiers via the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0). Retrieved October 7, 2026.

04

Part 4 · The numbers

The numbers, all in one place

Sources. Traffic, keywords, links, category positions and WHOIS: DataForSEO. Search volume and cost per click: Google Ads data via DataForSEO. Domain Rating: Ahrefs. Popularity ranks: Tranco and Google’s Chrome UX Report. Trends, videos, news and search suggestions: Google and YouTube via SerpApi. Reddit: read directly. Discord, TikTok and Facebook: each platform's public page. Starting price: the platform’s own pricing page. ▲ and ▼ mark a change of more than 3%.

05

Part 5 · Over time

How the numbers moved

385K

latest, Sep 26

385K

peak, Sep 26

1.6M

last 12 months

Estimated organic search traffic. Source: DataForSEO

113K

latest, Sep 26

Estimated organic search traffic. Source: DataForSEO

27.1K

latest, Aug 26

+49.7%

vs Sep 25

$4.74

US cost per click

Monthly search volume, Google Ads keyword data. Source: DataForSEO

110K

latest, Aug 26

Monthly search volume, Google Ads keyword data. Source: DataForSEO

57 / 100

now

May 31

peak week

Google Trends via SerpApi. Source: DataForSEO

Google Trends via SerpApi, monthly average of weekly values. Source: DataForSEO

Google Trends via SerpApi, retrieved October 7, 2026. “Breakout” means growth over 5,000%.

22 countries checked; together they account for 86% of estimated worldwide visits.

Organic traffic by country. Source: DataForSEO

Ranked keywords, United States. Source: DataForSEO

2,541

referring domains

50 / 100

Domain Rating by Ahrefs

49 / 100

DataForSEO domain rank

Referring domains and domain rank. Source: DataForSEO

13.1K

latest, Sep 26

Backlinks. Source: DataForSEO

06

In short

What I learned, and what I expect next

▲

Search traffic, latest monthvs August 2026

+21.5%

▲

Search traffic, last quarterlast 3 months vs the 3 before

+168.8%

▲

Search traffic, year on yearvs September 2025

+648.3%

▲

Brand demand (US searches)vs September 2025

+49.7%

▼

Google Trends interest57% of the 12-month peak

57 / 100

▲

Popularity rank, 30 days#127,013 worldwide

up 322 places

▲

Referring domains, 12 months2,541 sites link to it

+59.2%

●

Public attention11.5K combined video views

1 articles · 6 videos

●

YouTube reviews, by transcript6 transcripts read

5 positive · 1 mixed · 0 negative

●

Reddit threads, by stance10 threads read with top comments

4 positive · 5 mixed · 1 negative

●

Press articles, by stance2 articles read

1 positive · 1 mixed · 0 negative

▲ improving · ▼ worsening · ● steady or not directional. Thresholds: a change of more than 3% counts as a move.

Official links

Official site and social accounts

07

Part 7 · Method

How I measured all this

Traffic, keywords, backlinks, competitors, WHOIS

From DataForSEO, refreshed monthly. “Organic traffic” is an estimate of visits from Google results, modelled from the keywords a site ranks for. It leaves out direct visits, app traffic, paid ads and social referrals, so the real audience is bigger; that is why I also show an all-traffic popularity rank.

Brand search volume

Google Ads keyword data via DataForSEO. Google rounds these into bands, which is why months often repeat the same figure.

Domain Rating

Domain Rating by Ahrefs, a 100-point measure of backlink strength, published under Ahrefs’ Domain Rating license. The DataForSEO domain rank is a separate 100-point backlink score.

Popularity rank

The Tranco list, an academic ranking of the top million domains built from DNS and browser data; a rank, not a visit count. The Chrome UX Report tier is Google's own popularity bucket from real Chrome users.

Trends, videos, forums, press, search suggestions

Google Trends is relative interest on a 0 to 100 scale, not a count. News, YouTube, Reddit and autocomplete data come through SerpApi from public Google and YouTube results; video views are summed across the videos I found. For the most-watched videos I also pull the caption transcript through SerpApi, read it in full, and write a short account of what the video says plus my own conclusion; videos without captions are listed by title only. For Reddit I read each thread Google surfaces directly from reddit.com in a browser, record its upvotes, comment count and top comments as they stood that day, screenshot the post as it is publicly visible, and classify it after reading; threads with no analysis yet are listed by title. Press articles are read in full and classified the same way; pages that block automated readers are marked as unread. The category search check is a live Google result for the category's own term (United States, desktop) via DataForSEO. Discord counts come from the server's public invite page.

Hands-on testing

I purchased a Nastia membership and used the product myself: chat, memory, images and the paid extras. My own test tells me what each feature does; the verdict on each feature comes from what users publish, because for a brand this size their view is more grounded than one reviewer's.

Rounding and independence

Figures are rounded for display; charts show the exact values. Top AI Girlfriends is not affiliated with DataForSEO, Ahrefs, SerpApi, Google, or Nastia.