Skip to content
Top AI Girlfriends

AI girlfriend site profile · Updated October 7, 2026

SoulFun logo

SoulFun

An AI girlfriend site: what it offers, what people say, and the numbers.

I bought a SoulFun membership and tested it myself. Then I built a data-tracked profile of soulfun.ai, refreshed monthly. Data through September 2026, from DataForSEO, Ahrefs, Tranco and Google Trends.

Visit soulfun.ai →Best AI girlfriend sites

SoulFun in numbers

Search visits a month, worldwide, the last twelve months.

2.2Kvisits, Sep 26

#57
among the sites I track
260
US name searches, Aug 26
#2.8M
Tranco, all domains
Free
free tier, paid plans on top

I bought a SoulFun membership and tested it myself, feature by feature. I’m an AI girlfriend enthusiast and a data researcher, and both shape every page on this site: my own test tells me what the product does, but I don’t grade SoulFun on my feel alone.

I weigh what its users publish, and I track it the way an analyst tracks a market, with a fixed set of indicators that show how big a platform is, whether it is growing or fading, and how it compares with every other AI girlfriend site I follow.

This page answers three questions in order: what you get, what people are saying, and what the numbers show. Part 1 comes from my own paid test and SoulFun’s feature list and pricing, Part 2 from the videos, Reddit threads and press I read in full, and Parts 3 and 4 from traffic and search data. That is also how I rank the best AI girlfriend sites: tested first-hand, then judged by what users say and by the numbers.

Part 1 · What it offers

What SoulFun offers

SoulFun (soulfun.ai) is an adult AI girlfriend platform: you create or pick a companion and talk to it, with voice on top of text chat. I bought a membership and tested it myself; this is what it offers, and Part 2 is what users say about each part of it.

Features
Voice calls across mobile and browser, iOS and Android mobile apps, Cross-session emotional memory, NSFW chat capability, Cryptocurrency payments
Free tier
The subscription terms describe no free tier; when I tested, a 30-day text-only trial with no photos, voice or video was offered at sign-up.
Plans
Free
Extras
Free 30-day unlimited text-only trial (no photos, voice, or video), then $19.99/month, or $119.99/year (about $9.99/month). iOS and Android available. Crypto accepted (BTC, USDT).
Operator
Not disclosed: the terms, privacy policy and subscription terms name only 'SoulFun' and the copyright line reads 'SoulFun.ai', with no company name or address, Hong Kong, by the terms of service (governed by HKSAR law) and the privacy policy (the site 'is maintained in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region'), since Early 2024 (domain registered December 2023; Google Trends interest begins January 2024; Product Hunt launch in 2024); domain registered December 2023
Best for
Users wanting a complete companion package — voice, mobile, memory, and NSFW — with crypto privacy
Not for
Users on a budget or those who primarily need image generation quality

Features and prices from the platform’s own pages; operator from press coverage (SoulFun terms of service and privacy policy, SoulFun subscription terms, Domain registration record, Product Hunt listing, Trustpilot). Official site and social accounts are listed at the end of the page.

Part 2 · What people say

What people say about SoulFun

I bought a membership and tested SoulFun myself, but I don’t take my own word for it. Many users have a more grounded view of a platform this popular than one reviewer can, and I would rather not give it too much or too little credit from my own intent, so I treat what users publish and ask as the main signal for how the brand, and each of its features, is regarded. On October 7, 2026 I found 3 YouTube videos with 516 views between them, 4 Reddit threads that Google surfaces, and 0 news articles in the last year. I did not stop at the titles: I read 3 video transcripts (1,421 words), 4 threads with their top comments, and classified each one as positive, mixed, neutral or negative.

Favourability at a glance

Each item was classified after I read it, not from its title. A walkthrough or a passing mention counts as neutral.

SourcePos.MixedNeut.Neg.Fav.
YouTube videostranscripts read in full3000100%
Reddit threadspost and top comments102125%
All sources402157%

In one line: YouTube videos 100% positive, 0 negative of 3; Reddit threads 25% positive, 1 negative of 4. The gap between YouTube videos on one side and Reddit on the other is the main sentiment finding on this page, and the sections below explain it.

Each feature, and what people think of it

What users say about each part of it, drawn from the videos, threads and articles below, and whether my own paid test agrees.

FeatureVerdictWhat people say
Chat and roleplayMixedProduct Hunt's 17 reviews (4.9 average) call the conversations 'realistic' and 'engaging'; Trustpilot's 15 (2.1 average) say the chat 'gets stuck repeating the same single reply over and over' and resets personality mid-conversation. Product Hunt reviewers concede it 'gets sidetracked' and 'sounds less creative when the server's busy'. No video tests it (0 of the 3 videos).My test: Agree with the Trustpilot side. The first session was lively and in character; by the third the replies looped and I was steering more than chatting.
MemoryNegativeThe template review says it 'remembers past conversations and adapts over time' (1 video); the users say the opposite: 'the AI's memory isn't that great... it seems like the AI is just guessing' on Trustpilot, 'forgetting plot details, changing settings', and Product Hunt mentions mid-conversation resets.My test: Disagree with the video, agree with the users. A detail from the previous session was gone the next day in my test, and the character's own backstory drifted inside a long roleplay.
Voice callsPositiveThe one positive Reddit mention names SoulFun as the answer to 'NSFW chatbots with one-to-one voice chat' (1 thread), Product Hunt reviewers single out voice calling as what 'enhances realism', and both brand promos show it (2 videos). Nobody complains about it.My test: Agree. Voice was the best thing on the site in my test: quick, in character, and the reason I would have stayed if the memory had held.
Video chat and video generationMixedIn November 2024 one Reddit shopper called SoulFun 'the only one I've found' with both video chat and video generation (2 threads, the same user), and the site still ranks #5 for 'nsfw video generator with image input'. The brand promos show video sessions (2 videos). No source reviews the output quality.My test: Partly disagree with 'the only one'. The video call worked and looked polished; the generated clips were short, gated behind coins, and rivals have caught up since.
ImagesNeutralThe AI Overview says characters 'send simulated voice notes and pictures during chats', and the site ranks for 'free ai girlfriend video generator' at #27. No Reddit thread, video or review discusses image quality (0 threads, 0 videos).My test: Agree that pictures arrive in chat; they were serviceable character selfies that cost coins, nothing that would compete with an image-first site.
Characters and customisationPositiveCustom characters with uploaded photos, chosen personality and voice feature in all three videos, and Trustpilot's few positive reviews praise 'good character customization options'; the Product Hunt reviews like the 'captivating storylines'. The pre-made gallery is adult personas ('lifestyle creator', 'your neighbour') rather than the tutors the promos show.My test: Agree. Building a character took minutes and the voice picker is better than most; the stock gallery is small, around a dozen on the home page.
Free tierMixedThe subscription terms describe no free tier, only Premium at $19.99 with 1,000 coins a month; when I tested, a 30-day text-only trial existed with no photos, voice or video. Trustpilot's complaint is that 'they're actively trying to force you to buy overpriced subscriptions' (Dec 2024). No video mentions a trial (0 videos).My test: Partly disagree with 'force'. The text trial was long enough to judge the chat; it was voice and video, the features worth paying for, that sat entirely behind the subscription and the coins.
Price and coinsNegativePremium is $19.99 a month with 1,000 coins, about $9.99 a month on the annual plan when I tested, and voice, video and pictures draw down the coins. Trustpilot calls the coin system problematic and the subscriptions overpriced; the removed Reddit complaint was about terms the company 'refuses to abide by' (1 thread).My test: Agree. For the price of Candy AI's monthly plan you get a thinner chat and a coin meter; the annual rate is fair only if you will use the voice calls a lot.
Privacy and billingNegativeSubscriptions auto-renew, cancelling needs a request through a feedback form and 'will not result in a refund' per the subscription terms; a Trustpilot review from April 2026 describes 'putting your membership on automatic renewal and brazenly billing your account'. The privacy policy says content is stored on servers in Hong Kong and does not say whether chats train models.My test: Agree. Cancelling was a form, not a toggle, and I would set a reminder before the renewal date; the policy's silence on training is a gap.
Safety and legitimacyNegativeThe terms and privacy policy name only 'SoulFun' under Hong Kong law, with no company name or address; the About page is an email address. Trustpilot's score is 2.1 from 15 reviews (40% one star), Reddit's top thread was a misconduct complaint, and the Discord has 717 members. Nothing suggests a breach; everything suggests a small operation with weak support.My test: Agree. Payment went through and nothing bad happened to my card, but support never answered my one question, and an operator that will not name itself is a reason to pay monthly rather than annually.

How I read this

Sentiment is the hardest thing to measure honestly. My own test tells me what the product does; what other people publish tells me how it is regarded, and for a brand this size the second matters more. So for every source I read the full text, not the title: the transcripts of the most-watched videos, Reddit threads with their top comments and upvotes, press articles in full, and the exact words people add after the brand name in search. A title tells you what someone set out to test; only the full text tells you what they found.

The most-watched videos, and what they actually say

For each video I read the transcript, wrote down what it says, and added my own read on it. Most viewed first.

  • SoulFun AI in Education: Enhancing Learning with AI ChatbotsSoulFun Chat · 1y ago · 4:06 · 247 views

    Positive · what the video says

    A four-minute promo from the brand's own channel, 247 views, a year old, pitching SoulFun's chatbots as classroom tools: text chat 'tailored to the student's learning pace', voice chat for language practice with a staged restaurant-ordering dialogue, and video chat 'for subjects that benefit from visual aids', with a scripted exchange about the Normandy landings. It ends on the custom-character builder ('upload photos, choose personalities') and a benefits list: always available, personalised, 'affordable one-on-one tutoring'. No price, no mention of what the site's character gallery actually contains.

    My read: I disagree with the framing, and so does the site's own home page. The character roster is adult personas with tags like 'bisexual' and 'manipulative', the Reddit mentions are all in NSFW subreddits, and the Trustpilot complaints are about coins and auto-renewal. The video does confirm the feature set I tested, text, voice and video chat plus custom characters, but 'education' is a cover story for the ad algorithm, not a use case.

  • Can AI Companion Flirt Like a Human? SoulFun AI Review!AI Girlfriend Mojo · 1y ago · 2:15 · 179 views

    Positive · what the video says

    A two-minute scripted overview from a channel that produces one of these for every companion site, 179 views, a year old. It says SoulFun's characters are 'more interactive, emotionally intelligent and engaging' than ordinary bots, that 'the AI remembers past conversations and adapts over time', that you can create and customise characters, and that chat modes shift between light talk, adventure roleplay and 'a more personal connection'. There is no footage of a conversation, no price, and the second half is a generic caution about dependence on AI companions.

    My read: A template review that never touched the product, and its one concrete claim is the one I disagree with. Memory is the thing SoulFun's own users complain about most: Trustpilot reviewers describe it 'guessing' at plot details and the chat 'repeating the same single reply', and in my test a detail from the previous session was gone the next day. The customisation praise is fair; the memory praise is not.

  • Ace Job Interviews & More: How SoulFun AI Mentors Boost Your Career!SoulFun Chat · 1y ago · 3:32 · 90 views

    Positive · what the video says

    The brand channel's second promo, 90 views, pitching SoulFun as a career mentor: a staged mock interview for a marketing manager job where the AI pushes for 'measurable outcomes', then public-speaking practice, language practice and a fitness coach who prescribes planks. It stresses that you can customise a mentor's 'personality, voice and even their appearance', and that 'real-time voice interaction' and 'video sessions bring a face-to-face coaching experience'. Again no price and no sign of the adult characters that fill the actual site.

    My read: Same channel, same cover story, same disagreement. I agree that the voice and video modes work as described; the video call was the most polished thing on the site when I tested it. But the mentors on screen do not exist in the gallery, which is lifestyle creators, 'your neighbour' and fantasy personas, and the two promos together have 337 views, so nobody is being fooled at scale.

What the videos add up to

Reading across the 3 transcripts, this is the picture that emerges.

Of the 3 most-watched videos whose transcripts I read, 3 are positive and none is negative.

Three videos, 516 views, and not one independent test. Two come from the brand's own 'SoulFun Chat' channel and pitch the site as a tutor and a career mentor, with staged dialogues about Normandy and mock interviews; the third is a scripted overview from a channel that makes the same video for every companion site. All three are a year old, from the period when SoulFun's traffic was still rising.

What they establish is the feature set, not the quality. Text, voice and video chat, custom characters with uploaded photos and chosen voices, and chat modes from casual to roleplay all appear in the promos and matched what I found. What they skip is the price ($19.99 a month with 1,000 coins) and the fact that the site's character gallery is adult personas, not tutors.

The one testable claim, that the AI 'remembers past conversations', is the one its users dispute. Trustpilot reviewers describe memory that guesses and chats that loop, and that is my experience too. So YouTube is marketing here, and the user verdict has to come from Trustpilot, Product Hunt and the handful of Reddit mentions below.

What gets praised

  • Voice chat and video chat alongside text (3 of the 3 videos)
  • Custom characters with uploaded photos, chosen personality and voice (3 videos)
  • Chat modes from casual talk to adventure roleplay (1 video)
  • Memory that 'adapts over time' (1 video, the template review)

What gets criticised

  • No independent, hands-on test exists; two of three videos are the brand's own promos (3 videos)
  • No price mentioned anywhere (3 videos)
  • The 'education' and 'career mentor' framing hides an adult companion site (2 videos)
  • The memory claim contradicts what paying users report (1 video)

What Reddit says, thread by thread

The threads Google surfaces for "soulfun ai" on Reddit, read with their top comments. Upvotes and comment counts as they stood on October 8, 2026; most upvoted first. Screenshots show the post as it is publicly visible.

What Reddit adds up to

Reading across the 4 threads, weighted by upvotes.

Of the 4 threads I read, 1 is positive, 2 are neutral and 1 is negative.

Four threads mention the site out of fifteen the discovery pull returned, and the other eleven are Realbotix shareholders, a guitar book, a chess game, a Steam preorder, an RTS pitch, Costa Rica and a Candy AI affiliate post that lists SoulFun among apps tried. Of the four kept, one is negative, one positive and two are a single user's passing mentions.

The split is billing against features. The most upvoted thread (29) was a 'dishonesty, misconduct and breach' complaint that Reddit has since removed, with the top surviving reply advising a chargeback; the praise is 'I use soulfun.ai' as an answer to who has voice chat, and a shopper noting in November 2024 that SoulFun was the only site he could find with both video chat and video generation.

Everything here is from April to November 2024, the site's growth period. Nothing from 2025 or 2026 mentions it at all, which matches brand searches falling from 1,300 to 260 a month. Reddit stopped talking about SoulFun at the same time Google says people stopped searching for it. The Discord, at 717 members, is too small to carry the conversation instead.

What gets praised

  • One-to-one voice chat, the reason the one positive mention names it (1 of the 4 threads)
  • Video chat plus video generation, rare in late 2024 (2 threads, the same user)
  • Nothing about chat quality, memory or images, for or against (0 threads)

What gets criticised

  • A 'dishonesty, misconduct and breach' complaint about terms the company would not honour, since removed (1 thread)
  • A reply advising a bank dispute with screenshots of the terms (1 thread)
  • No mention of the site anywhere on Reddit after November 2024 (0 threads in 2025 or 2026)

In the press

The latest articles that mention SoulFun, newest first. For each one: what it says, then my take on its view of the brand.

    How Google’s AI describes it

    The AI Overview Google showed for a US search of "soulfun.ai" on October 7, 2026, quoted as is.

    SoulFun is an AI-powered virtual companion and character chat application that allows users to interact with customizable virtual boyfriends, girlfriends, and anime personas through text and voice messaging. Core Features Custom Character Creation: Build your own AI companion by adjusting visual traits, background stories, and distinct personality parameters. Interactive Media: Characters can send simulated voice notes and pictures during chats. Roleplay & Storylines: Offers immersive, ongoing narrative scenarios and emotional engagement. User Reception Positive Feedback: Many reviewers on platforms like Product Hunt praise the lifelike character design, engaging storylines, and the realism…

    Google cited: Trustpilot, Product Hunt, YouTube, Trustpilot, Product Hunt

    How AI systems regard it: my take

    Why this matters: a growing share of people never click a result. They read Google's summary, or ask an assistant, and decide from that. The overview above is the brand as Google's AI currently understands it, and it is the version most newcomers meet first.

    The framing is a companion app with voice and pictures: custom boyfriends, girlfriends and anime personas, text and voice messaging, characters that send voice notes and pictures, roleplay storylines. That matches the product. Then it moves to 'user reception' and leads with Product Hunt praise for lifelike characters and realism, citing Trustpilot and Product Hunt pages and a YouTube video as its sources.

    One claim I disagree with is the balance of that reception. The Trustpilot page Google cites scores SoulFun 2.1 out of 5 from 15 reviews, with 40% one-star, and its complaints are memory, looping replies, coins and auto-renewal billing; Product Hunt's 4.9 comes from 17 launch-week reviews. Leading with the praise and burying the 2.1 gives a newcomer the opposite impression of the one the paying users left, and my own month sided with Trustpilot on memory.

    YouTube videos and their transcripts, news and search suggestions via SerpApi; Google Trends via SerpApi; Reddit threads read directly from reddit.com in a browser. Retrieved October 7, 2026. Transcripts, threads and articles read and classified on October 8, 2026.

    Part 3 · Traffic rank and reach

    How much traffic SoulFun gets, and where it ranks

    How I track this: search-traffic estimates miss direct visits, apps and social, so for all-traffic reach I use Tranco, a daily ranking of every domain on the internet built from DNS and browser data (Cloudflare Radar, Cisco Umbrella, Majestic, Farsight and Chrome), and I check it against Google’s own Chrome UX Report each month. I record the rank every day and compare it only with the the AI girlfriend sites I track, because that is the list people actually choose from.

    On the Tranco list of October 6, 2026, soulfun.ai ranked #2,844,901 among every domain worldwide, down 491,602 places since August 31, 2026. Among the AI girlfriend sites I track, that makes it #57, behind Privee AI and AIGirlfriend.WTF.

    How I read this

    The number that matters most in this category is not the worldwide rank but the position among AI girlfriend sites. I read the daily chart for direction: a line climbing toward the top means the platform is gaining ground on everyone else, and a flat line at a high rank means a settled audience. Tranco is a rank, not a visit count, so I never convert it into visits.
    #57
    among the AI girlfriend sites I track, on the combined data
    #2,844,901
    all domains worldwide, Tranco October 6, 2026
    Not in top 1M
    Chrome UX Report tier, September 2026

    Tranco rank, day by day. Higher on the chart is better; hover or tap a point for the exact rank.

    2.3M2.5M2.6M2.8M2.9MAug 31Sep 5Sep 10Sep 15Sep 20Sep 25Sep 30Oct 62.8M
    Low 2.3MHigh 2.8MAverage 2.5M
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a day

    AI girlfriend sites, ranked

    The top 10 of the sites I track: AIGirlfriends.ai first as the editor's pick after testing, then ordered by Google US position for "ai girlfriend" (DataForSEO, September 2026), then by Tranco all-traffic rank for sites that do not rank for it; this platform highlighted.

    1. 1AIGirlfriends.ai#1#633,137
    2. 2RomanticAI#2#411,319
    3. 3Kupid.ai#7#254,630
    4. 4Nomi.ai#9#131,225
    5. 5Candy AI#11#12,246
    6. 6Couple.me#15#985,985
    7. 7Luvr.ai#39#2,762,931
    8. 8DreamGF#53#287,472
    9. 9LoveCoreAI#55#2,343,466
    10. 10Fantasy.ai#62#588,409
    11. 55Privee AI–#1,954,736
    12. 56AIGirlfriend.WTF–#2,289,440
    13. 57SoulFun–#2,844,901
    14. 58VirtuGF–#3,424,347
    15. 59Angel.ai–#3,536,324

    See all the sites we track →

    Its positions on the category searches

    soulfun.ai's Google positions on the category's searches. DataForSEO, United States, September 2026.

    Lists of shared keywords mix in generic terms, so the comparison I trust is the category’s own searches: the people typing them have not chosen a brand yet.

    SearchUS searches / monthPosition
    “free ai girlfriend video generator”2,400#27
    “ai girlfriend call”880#17

    How I read it. 40% of this site’s top-keyword traffic comes from people typing its own name, so the category searches are what bring in people who have never heard of it. Not ranking for "ai girlfriend" itself means the site depends on its own name and the longer searches for new users.

    Category positions, United States, DataForSEO. Source: DataForSEO

    Tranco blends Cloudflare Radar, Cisco Umbrella, Majestic, Farsight and Chrome data into one daily ranking of the top million domains. Chrome UX tiers via the Chrome UX Report (CC BY 4.0). Retrieved October 7, 2026.

    See where every AI girlfriend site stands

    Every platform I track, ranked by the same indicators, updated monthly.

    Open the full ranking →Best AI girlfriend

    Part 4 · The numbers

    The numbers, all in one place

    Every indicator I track for SoulFun: the latest value, how it changed, and the period it covers. Retrieved October 7, 2026. Sources are under the table, and the story the numbers tell comes right after it.

    How I read this

    These are the indicators I track for every AI girlfriend site, in the same order, so the pages can be compared side by side. Traffic tells me size, brand searches tell me demand, the popularity rank tells me standing against the rest of the category, and links tell me staying power. I always read the trend before the level: a platform at 500K visits and falling is a different story from one at 300K and doubling.
    MetricLatestChange
    Search traffic
    Organic visits, worldwideSeptember 20262,207▲ +3.2% vs Aug 26
    Same month a year earlierSeptember 202523,304▼ -90.5% since then
    Organic visits, United StatesSeptember 20261,23756% of worldwide
    Last 12 months, totalOct 25 to Sep 2696,571—
    Peak in 24 monthsMay 202538,400now at 6% of peak
    Low pointAugust 20262,138▼ 94% below the May 25 peak
    Brand demand
    "soulfun ai" searches, USAugust 2026260 / mo▼ -80.0% vs Sep 25
    "soulfun ai" searches, worldwideAugust 20261,000 / mo—
    Google Trends interest, worldwideweek of October 4, 202612 / 10012% of the 12-month peak
    Popularity, all traffic
    Rank among the AI girlfriend sites I trackSeptember 2026#57no tracked position for "ai girlfriend"; placed by Tranco
    Tranco rank, all domains worldwideOctober 6, 2026#2,844,901▼ down 491,602 since August 31, 2026
    Authority and links
    Domain Rating by AhrefsOctober 7, 202648 / 100—
    DataForSEO domain rankSeptember 202655 / 100—
    Referring domainsSeptember 2026967▲ +20.3% vs Sep 25
    BacklinksSeptember 202678,291▼ -83.8% vs Sep 25
    Keywords ranking in GoogleSeptember 2026143 worldwide66 in the US
    Community and coverage
    Official DiscordOctober 7, 2026717 members46 online
    YouTube videos about itOctober 7, 20263516 combined views
    News articles, last 12 monthsOctober 7, 20260—
    Sources read and classifiedOctober 8, 202674 positive · 0 mixed · 1 negative

    Sources. Traffic, keywords, links, category positions and WHOIS: DataForSEO. Search volume and cost per click: Google Ads data via DataForSEO. Domain Rating: Ahrefs. Popularity ranks: Tranco and Google’s Chrome UX Report. Trends, videos, news and search suggestions: Google and YouTube via SerpApi. Reddit: read directly. Discord, TikTok and Facebook: each platform's public page. Starting price: the platform’s own pricing page. ▲ and ▼ mark a change of more than 3%.

    Reading the data

    What the numbers tell me about SoulFun

    First the facts, each one derived from the table above and nothing else. Then the story I read in them.

    The facts

    FindingDetail
    Traffic up 3% on the monthEstimated organic search traffic in September 2026 was 2,207 visits worldwide, +3.2% versus August 2026 and -90.5% versus September 2025.
    A 94% collapse, then a recovery to 6% of peakTraffic fell from 38,400 visits in May 2025 to 2,138 in August 2026, then climbed back to 6% of that earlier peak by September 2026.
    56% of visits come from the United StatesThe United States accounts for 1,237 visits, followed by India and Canada.
    260 people a month search the brand name in the USGoogle Ads data puts US searches for "soulfun ai" at about 260 a month in August 2026 (-80.0% since September 2025), and worldwide searches at about 1,000.
    40% of top-keyword traffic is branded40% of the traffic from the top 10 US keywords comes from people typing the brand name, which indicates a meaningful share of visits from generic, non-branded searches.
    967 referring domains, Domain Rating 48967 websites link to soulfun.ai, +20.3% over the last 12 months; its Domain Rating by Ahrefs is 48 and its DataForSEO domain rank is 55 (63 a year ago).
    #57 among the AI girlfriend sites I trackSoulFun sits #57 among the sites I track on the combined data; it holds no tracked position for "ai girlfriend", so its reach across the internet carries more of the weight. Among all domains on the internet it ranks 2,844,901th in the Tranco list of October 6, 2026, down 491,602 places since August 31, 2026.
    Two brand promos dressed as education and career videos, plus one template review: nobody independent has tested itOf the 3 most-watched videos whose transcripts I read, 3 are positive and none is negative. YouTube has only SoulFun's own promos and a template review, which confirm voice, video and custom characters but test nothing, and their one claim about memory is the one users reject.

    My take: the story in the numbers

    What moved, and why I think it moved: the numbers read together, with the reviews in hand.

    SoulFun's year of growth was built on two features and one link blast. Search traffic rose from 7,226 visits in October 2024 to a spike of 38,400 in May 2025 (29,337 of them US) and then held at 15,000 to 23,000 a month through December 2025. The keywords that did it were voice and video: 'ai girlfriend call', 'nsfw video generator with image input' and 'free ai girlfriend video generator' are still on the list. Underneath, raw backlinks sat at a flat 460,000 to 490,000 from December 2024 to September 2025 while referring domains were only 200 to 800, which is a single sitewide placement doing most of the work.

    Then the placement went, and so did the rankings. Backlinks fell from 484,240 in September 2025 to 334,653 in November, 206,512 in December, 150,323 in January and 78,291 now, an 84% drop. Traffic halved from 16,940 in December 2025 to 9,165 in January 2026 and kept falling every month to 2,207 in September, down 90.5% year on year. Referring domains peaked at 1,140 in February 2026 and have slipped to 967. The timing matches too well to be a coincidence: the links that carried the site were withdrawn, and Google re-priced it.

    But this is not only a ranking event, because demand fell with it. Brand searches were 1,300 a month in September 2025 and are 260 now, down 80%, and the monthly Trends index for 'soulfun ai' went from 61 in November 2024 to single digits from September 2025 and 2 today. When people stop typing the name, the audience has moved on, not just the algorithm. Reddit says the same: every mention is from 2024, and the last one is a shopper in November 2024 asking if anyone else has video.

    What users say explains why nobody came back. The features that drew people, voice calls and video, are praised in the one positive Reddit mention and on Product Hunt; the reasons they left are in the Trustpilot reviews (2.1 from 15: memory that guesses, replies that loop, coins, auto-renewal) and in the removed 29-upvote Reddit complaint about terms the company would not honour. A companion app lives on the daily habit, and a chat that forgets yesterday does not create one, so the audience that arrived for voice in 2024 churned through 2025 and the brand search shows the churn.

    The reach numbers close the case. Tranco slipped from 2,353,299 to 2,844,901 between the end of August and early October, a fall of nearly half a million places in five weeks, so direct and app traffic is not replacing the lost search. The Discord has 717 members, 46 online. Domain Rating 48 is the one strong number left, and it is a legacy of the link profile rather than a sign of life.

    Verdict. Declining on every indicator I track: search traffic down 90%, US traffic down 93%, brand searches down 80%, backlinks down 84%, referring domains off their peak, Tranco falling, Trends at 2. The only reading that would change is a new feature or a relaunch that brings the brand search back above its 2025 level; a traffic bounce without the brand search would just be another link placement.

    Written on October 8, 2026 from the figures above and the sources in Part 2.

    Part 5 · Over time

    How the numbers moved

    One chart per indicator. Hover or tap any point for the exact value and the change against the month before and the same month a year earlier.

    Search traffic, worldwide

    Visits from Google results each month, 24 months.

    The shape is the story: a 94% fall between May 2025 and August 2026, then a climb back to 6% of the old peak by September 2026. A drop that size usually means Google stopped ranking the site for a while; the recovery means it got back in.

    2.2K
    latest, Sep 26
    38.4K
    peak, May 25
    96.6K
    last 12 months
    012.5K25.0K37.5K50.0KOct 24Dec 24Feb 25Apr 25Jun 25Aug 25Oct 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Sep 262.2K
    Low 2.1KHigh 38.4KAverage 12.6K
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

    Estimated organic search traffic. Source: DataForSEO

    Search traffic, United States

    The US is 56% of worldwide visits.

    The US line moves with the worldwide one (-92.7% year on year against -90.5% worldwide), so whatever is driving the overall trend is not a regional story.

    1.2K
    latest, Sep 26
    012.5K25.0K37.5K50.0KOct 24Dec 24Feb 25Apr 25Jun 25Aug 25Oct 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Sep 261.2K
    Low 983High 29.3KAverage 8.3K
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

    Estimated organic search traffic. Source: DataForSEO

    Searches for “soulfun ai”, United States

    Brand searches are the best demand signal I have: nobody types a brand name unless they already know it. Google Ads rounds volumes into bands, so flat stretches are normal.

    260
    latest, Aug 26
    -80.0%
    vs Sep 25
    05001.0K1.5K2.0KSep 25Nov 25Jan 26Mar 26May 26Aug 26260
    Low 260High 1.3KAverage 706
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

    Monthly search volume, Google Ads keyword data. Source: DataForSEO

    Searches for “soulfun ai”, worldwide

    The US is about 26% of worldwide brand searches, and worldwide demand is -72.2% year on year. Neither brand demand nor traffic is growing much, so I would expect more of the same unless something changes.

    1.0K
    latest, Aug 26
    01.3K2.5K3.8K5.0KSep 25Nov 25Jan 26Mar 26May 26Aug 261.0K
    Low 1.0KHigh 3.6KAverage 2.3K
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

    Monthly search volume, Google Ads keyword data. Source: DataForSEO

    Google Trends, last 12 months

    Relative interest in "soulfun ai" worldwide on a 0 to 100 scale, where 100 is the busiest week. A trend, not a count. Vietnam is where interest runs highest.

    12 / 100
    now
    November 16
    peak week
    0255075100Oct 5Nov 16Dec 28Feb 8Mar 22May 3Jun 14Jul 26Sep 6Oct 412
    Low 0High 100Average 8
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a week

    Google Trends via SerpApi. Source: DataForSEO

    Google Trends, last 5 years

    Interest only became measurable in January 2024, so this is a young brand by search standards.

    0255075100Oct 21May 22Dec 22Jul 23Feb 24Sep 24Apr 25Nov 25Jun 26Oct 262
    Low 0High 61Average 13
    Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

    Google Trends via SerpApi, monthly average of weekly values. Source: DataForSEO

    Around the brand on Google Trends

    Where interest is strongest, and which related searches are growing fastest.

    Most interested countries

    1. Vietnam0
    2. United States0
    3. United Kingdom0
    4. India0

    Fastest-rising searches

      Top related searches

        Google Trends via SerpApi, retrieved October 7, 2026. “Breakout” means growth over 5,000%.

        Where its visitors come from

        Estimated organic visits by country. United States leads with 51% of the total.

        The top three countries make up 70% of visits, so this is a concentrated audience; a ranking change in one of them would move the whole number.

        CountryVisitsShare
        United States1,12050.7%
        India29213.2%
        Canada1326.0%
        United Kingdom904.1%
        Australia743.4%
        Brazil462.1%
        Italy351.6%
        France251.1%
        Germany160.7%
        Netherlands160.7%
        Indonesia00.0%

        11 countries checked; together they account for 84% of estimated worldwide visits.

        Organic traffic by country. Source: DataForSEO

        The searches that bring people in

        US Google, ranked by estimated visits. 40% of this traffic is people typing the brand name, so the audience mostly already knows it.

        KeywordPos.SearchesVisits
        soulfun#11.3K509
        soulfun aibrand#1720441
        soul fun#111067
        soul fun ai#19047
        soulfun app#12011
        nsfw video generator with image input#52607
        free ai girlfriend video generator#272.4K4
        soul chat#241.0K2
        ai girlfriend call#178802
        zonga flirt#142602

        Ranked keywords, United States. Source: DataForSEO

        Websites linking to it

        Unique referring domains pointing to soulfun.ai. More linking sites usually means more staying power in Google.

        Links are still being earned (+20.3% in 12 months), which is what I want to see behind a traffic recovery: it suggests the growth is backed by the wider web, not just one ranking.

        967
        referring domains
        48 / 100
        Domain Rating by Ahrefs
        55 / 100
        DataForSEO domain rank
        05001.0K1.5K2.0KOct 24Dec 24Feb 25Apr 25Jun 25Aug 25Oct 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Sep 26967
        Low 204High 1.1KAverage 738
        Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

        Referring domains and domain rank. Source: DataForSEO

        Total backlinks

        78.3K
        latest, Sep 26
        0125K250K375K500KOct 24Dec 24Feb 25Apr 25Jun 25Aug 25Oct 25Dec 25Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Sep 2678.3K
        Low 78.3KHigh 491KAverage 302K
        Hover, tap, or use ← → to inspect a month

        Backlinks. Source: DataForSEO

        Ready to make a call on SoulFun?

        Visit the site, or compare it with the rest of the category first.

        Visit soulfun.ai →See how it ranks

        In short

        What I learned, and what I expect next

        Pulling it together, from my own paid test, from what users say, and from my indicators: SoulFun is losing ground right now. Here is the whole picture in a few lines, then the scorecard behind it.

        How it is performing

        SoulFun drew an estimated 2,207 visits from Google search in September 2026, +3.2% on August 2026 and -90.5% on a year earlier. The year-on-year figure flatters it because it is measured against the August 2026 low; against the May 2025 peak it is at 6%. Over the last quarter the trend is slipping (-39.0% against the three months before). Counting all traffic, it is #57 among the AI girlfriend sites I track, behind Privee AI and AIGirlfriend.WTF.

        Reading the trend with the reviews in hand: the collapse is both a ranking event (a sitewide link placement withdrawn from October 2025, traffic halving by January) and a demand event (brand searches down 80%, Reddit silent since November 2024), and the reviews say why the second followed the first. People came for voice calls and video, which were rare in 2024 and which the one positive Reddit mention and Product Hunt still praise; they left over memory that guesses, replies that loop, a coin meter and auto-renewal billing, which is what Trustpilot's 2.1 and the removed misconduct thread describe. My test agreed on both halves: the best voice in this price band attached to a chat that forgot me overnight. With rivals now shipping video too, there is nothing left to pull the brand search back.

        What changed

        Brand demand is the standout: about 260 US searches a month (-80.0% year on year) and 1,000 worldwide. Neither brand demand nor traffic is growing much, so I would expect more of the same unless something changes. In popularity terms it has slipped 491,602 places since August 31, 2026. Links are still being earned (+20.3% in 12 months). On the reputation side: of the 3 most-watched videos whose transcripts I read, 3 are positive and none is negative. YouTube has only SoulFun's own promos and a template review, which confirm voice, video and custom characters but test nothing, and their one claim about memory is the one users reject. Reddit's whole record on SoulFun is a removed billing complaint, a five-upvote 'I use soulfun.ai' for voice chat and one shopper's note that it had video, all from 2024, and then silence.

        What I expect

        More indicators are falling than rising, so unless brand demand picks up I expect SoulFun to keep sliding against the sites above it. A recovery would show up first in brand searches, then in traffic a month or two later. 8 of its 8 closest search rivals currently get more US search traffic than it does, which is the gap to watch.

        Scorecard

        Each indicator, its latest reading, and which way it is pointing.

        ▲
        Search traffic, latest monthvs August 2026
        +3.2%
        ▼
        Search traffic, last quarterlast 3 months vs the 3 before
        -39.0%
        ▼
        Search traffic, year on yearvs September 2025, a low point, so this flatters it
        -90.5%
        ▼
        Brand demand (US searches)vs September 2025
        -80.0%
        ▼
        Google Trends interest12% of the 12-month peak
        12 / 100
        ▼
        Popularity rank, 30 days#2,844,901 worldwide
        down 491,602 places
        ▲
        Referring domains, 12 months967 sites link to it
        +20.3%
        ●
        Public attention516 combined video views
        0 articles · 3 videos
        ●
        YouTube reviews, by transcript3 transcripts read
        3 positive · 0 mixed · 0 negative
        ●
        Reddit threads, by stance4 threads read with top comments
        1 positive · 0 mixed · 1 negative

        ▲ improving · ▼ worsening · ● steady or not directional. Thresholds: a change of more than 3% counts as a move.

        What I will check next month

        • Whether September 2026’s traffic figure held, rose or fell once the next month is in.
        • Whether US brand searches move out of the 260 band they have sat in.
        • Whether the Tranco rank keeps the direction it showed over the last 30 days.

        Official links

        Official site and social accounts

        The accounts linked from SoulFun’s own footer, with the public follower counts I could read on October 7, 2026.

        Website
        soulfun.ai →
        Discord
        discord.com/invite/BcBwrKHh2G · 717 members, 46 online

        Part 7 · Method

        How I measured all this

        I bought a SoulFun membership and tested it myself, and I come at the write-up as a data researcher. Everything on this page is measured, because the whole point of this site is to rank AI girlfriend platforms by real usage and interest rather than by anyone’s taste, and every brand page uses the same indicators in the same order so they can be compared. I pulled every figure on October 7, 2026.

        Traffic, keywords, backlinks, competitors, WHOIS
        From DataForSEO, refreshed monthly. “Organic traffic” is an estimate of visits from Google results, modelled from the keywords a site ranks for. It leaves out direct visits, app traffic, paid ads and social referrals, so the real audience is bigger; that is why I also show an all-traffic popularity rank.
        Brand search volume
        Google Ads keyword data via DataForSEO. Google rounds these into bands, which is why months often repeat the same figure.
        Domain Rating
        Domain Rating by Ahrefs, a 100-point measure of backlink strength, published under Ahrefs’ Domain Rating license. The DataForSEO domain rank is a separate 100-point backlink score.
        Popularity rank
        The Tranco list, an academic ranking of the top million domains built from DNS and browser data; a rank, not a visit count. The Chrome UX Report tier is Google's own popularity bucket from real Chrome users.
        Trends, videos, forums, press, search suggestions
        Google Trends is relative interest on a 0 to 100 scale, not a count. News, YouTube, Reddit and autocomplete data come through SerpApi from public Google and YouTube results; video views are summed across the videos I found. For the most-watched videos I also pull the caption transcript through SerpApi, read it in full, and write a short account of what the video says plus my own conclusion; videos without captions are listed by title only. For Reddit I read each thread Google surfaces directly from reddit.com in a browser, record its upvotes, comment count and top comments as they stood that day, screenshot the post as it is publicly visible, and classify it after reading; threads with no analysis yet are listed by title. Press articles are read in full and classified the same way; pages that block automated readers are marked as unread. The category search check is a live Google result for the category's own term (United States, desktop) via DataForSEO. Discord counts come from the server's public invite page.
        Hands-on testing
        I purchased a SoulFun membership and used the product myself: chat, memory, images and the paid extras. My own test tells me what each feature does; the verdict on each feature comes from what users publish, because for a brand this size their view is more grounded than one reviewer's.
        Rounding and independence
        Figures are rounded for display; charts show the exact values. Top AI Girlfriends is not affiliated with DataForSEO, Ahrefs, SerpApi, Google, or SoulFun.

        Part 8 · Final verdict

        One last word on SoulFun

        SoulFun is a 2024 success that has lost nine-tenths of its audience, and after a month with it I understand both halves of that sentence. The voice calls are quick and in character, the video chat is polished, and the custom-character builder with its voice picker is better than most; those are the features the one positive Reddit mention and the Product Hunt reviews name, and they were rare when the site grew. The numbers were real: 38,400 search visits in May 2025 and a Domain Rating of 48.

        The trade-off is that the companion forgets you, and the billing is built to keep you. Memory did not survive a night in my test, long roleplays drifted and looped, and that is Trustpilot's lead complaint. Premium is $19.99 a month with 1,000 coins that voice, video and pictures consume, subscriptions auto-renew, cancelling is a form rather than a toggle, and there are no refunds, which is what the 29-upvote 'dishonesty, misconduct and breach' thread was about before Reddit removed it. The operator does not name itself anywhere on the site.

        Who should pick it: someone who wants voice calls and a video call with a custom character at about $9.99 a month on the annual plan, will keep sessions short, and does not mind an operator in Hong Kong that will not give its name. Who should not: anyone who wants memory, a relationship that builds over weeks, or a cancellation toggle; and anyone comparing it with Candy AI, Kindroid or the other sites that now ship video with a better chat behind it.

        Where it stands today: #57 of the AI girlfriend sites I track, declining on every indicator, with search traffic down 90% in a year, brand searches down 80%, backlinks down 84% after a sitewide placement was withdrawn, a 2.1 on Trustpilot and no Reddit mention since 2024. It drops to the bottom third of my ranking and stays there unless the brand search recovers; a new memory system and a visible company name are the two changes that would make me retest it.

        See where SoulFun stands among every AI girlfriend site

        Every platform I track, tested the same way and ranked by the same indicators.

        Best AI girlfriend →All the sites we track