CraveU
#39 on the ranking
CraveU is the cheapest way I know to get a picture with every message, and that is both its case and its catch.
Read my full CraveU analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
CraveU leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $9.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting desire-focused explicit companion chat at a budget price | Users who want a feature-rich companion platform at a budget price with strong chat and image quality |
| Not for | Users needing voice, a mobile app, video generation, or emotional relationship depth | Those who need reliable live voice calls or a usable free tier to test the experience |
| Operator | Cozyai LLC | DreamAI SRL |
| Pricing notes | A genuine free tier now exists (casual chat, restricted memory, no image/audio, no NSFW), with paid tiers confirmed via CraveU's own pricing page: Essential ~$4.99-5.99/month, Pro ~$7.99-14.99/month, Ultimate ~$29.99-49.99/month, plus token top-up bundles. This replaces the flat $6.99/month, no-free-tier structure tested originally. Desire-focused NSFW companion. | Tiered plans starting at Bronze $9.99/mo, up through Silver $19.99/mo, Gold $49.99/mo, and Diamond $99.99/mo, each raising the messages, images, video, and voice credit allowances. Roughly 10% off with a 3-month commitment. Token system for additional features. Cryptocurrency accepted. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. DreamGF simply does more: custom character creation, nsfw chat and image generation and voice messages are on its list and not on CraveU's. More features is only better if you will use them.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #39 | ▲#8 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | #53 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #300,064 | ▲#287,472 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | Top 500,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲5,705 | 4,657 |
| Search visits a month, US | ▲2,890 | 2,849 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲4,400 | 2,900 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 41 | ▲60 |
| Referring domains | 2,250 | ▲3,172 |
| Backlinks | 20,663 | ▲152,898 |
| Domain registered | June 2024 | March 2023 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 4 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 2 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, DreamGF is there at #53; CraveU does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why DreamGF sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, CraveU is the busier site: 5,705 search visits a month worldwide, about the same as DreamGF gets (4,657). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 4,400 people a month type CraveU's name, against 2,900 for DreamGF. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there DreamGF comes out ahead (#287,472 against #300,064). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. DreamGF's Domain Rating of 60 against 41 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. DreamGF is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: CraveU is bigger, DreamGF is the one the category search points to.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| SceneSnap image generation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Characters and creator rewards | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Mobile app | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and billing | Users mixedMy test: Disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Characters and customisation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Price and renewal | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Tokens | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 2 of 10 features positive for CraveU and 2 of 10 features positive for DreamGF. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for CraveU and 1 point for DreamGF, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
CraveU
#39 on the ranking
CraveU is the cheapest way I know to get a picture with every message, and that is both its case and its catch.
Read my full CraveU analysis →DreamGF
#8 on the ranking
DreamGF has the deepest character builder I have used and the pricing structure I would least recommend.
Read my full DreamGF analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. CraveU and DreamGF are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.