Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

CraveU logovsDreamGF logo

CraveU vs DreamGF

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

CraveU leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

CraveU logoDreamGF logo
Rank on this site#39▲#8
Google US, “ai girlfriend”–#53
Search visits a month▲5.7K4.7K
Name searches a month, US▲4.4K2.9K

In short

Two sites of similar size; here is what separates them.

  • DreamGF ranks #53 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; CraveU holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#8 against #39 on this site).
  • CraveU gets about 5,705 search visits a month worldwide against 4,657 for DreamGF (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for CraveU by name about 4,400 times a month in the US, against 2,900 for DreamGF.
  • CraveU has a free tier and paid plans from Free; DreamGF has a free tier and paid plans from $9.99/mo.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerCraveUDreamGF
Free tier▲Yes▲Yes
Entry paid planFree$9.99/mo
Adult contentAllowed on paid plansAllowed on paid plans
Features
  • Desire-focused explicit NSFW chat
  • Intense craving dynamic personas
  • No content filtering
  • In-chat image generation (SceneSnap), added since original testing
  • Custom character creation
  • NSFW chat and image generation
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calls
  • News feed with social elements
  • Image generation (fast rendering)
  • Token system
  • Crypto payments
Best forUsers wanting desire-focused explicit companion chat at a budget priceUsers who want a feature-rich companion platform at a budget price with strong chat and image quality
Not forUsers needing voice, a mobile app, video generation, or emotional relationship depthThose who need reliable live voice calls or a usable free tier to test the experience
OperatorCozyai LLCDreamAI SRL
Pricing notesA genuine free tier now exists (casual chat, restricted memory, no image/audio, no NSFW), with paid tiers confirmed via CraveU's own pricing page: Essential ~$4.99-5.99/month, Pro ~$7.99-14.99/month, Ultimate ~$29.99-49.99/month, plus token top-up bundles. This replaces the flat $6.99/month, no-free-tier structure tested originally. Desire-focused NSFW companion.Tiered plans starting at Bronze $9.99/mo, up through Silver $19.99/mo, Gold $49.99/mo, and Diamond $99.99/mo, each raising the messages, images, video, and voice credit allowances. Roughly 10% off with a 3-month commitment. Token system for additional features. Cryptocurrency accepted.

My take

Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. DreamGF simply does more: custom character creation, nsfw chat and image generation and voice messages are on its list and not on CraveU's. More features is only better if you will use them.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersCraveUDreamGF
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#39▲#8
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026–#53
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains#300,064▲#287,472
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX ReportTop 500,000Top 500,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate▲5,7054,657
Search visits a month, US▲2,8902,849
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO▲4,4002,900
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10041▲60
Referring domains2,250▲3,172
Backlinks20,663▲152,898
Domain registeredJune 2024March 2023
Public record I read1 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 0 articles4 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 2 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, DreamGF is there at #53; CraveU does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why DreamGF sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, CraveU is the busier site: 5,705 search visits a month worldwide, about the same as DreamGF gets (4,657). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 4,400 people a month type CraveU's name, against 2,900 for DreamGF. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there DreamGF comes out ahead (#287,472 against #300,064). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. DreamGF's Domain Rating of 60 against 41 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. DreamGF is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: CraveU is bigger, DreamGF is the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureCraveUDreamGF
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
SceneSnap image generationUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
VoiceUsers negativeMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Characters and creator rewardsUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Free tierUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers negativeMy test: Agree
Price and tokensUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree–
Mobile appUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Privacy and billingUsers mixedMy test: DisagreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Safety and legitimacyUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Image generation–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Characters and customisation–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Price and renewal–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Tokens–Users negativeMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users rate them about the same: 2 of 10 features positive for CraveU and 2 of 10 features positive for DreamGF. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for CraveU and 1 point for DreamGF, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

CraveU logo

CraveU

#39 on the ranking

CraveU is the cheapest way I know to get a picture with every message, and that is both its case and its catch.

Read my full CraveU analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. CraveU and DreamGF are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.