CraveU
#39 on the ranking
CraveU is the cheapest way I know to get a picture with every message, and that is both its case and its catch.
Read my full CraveU analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
OurDream.ai leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $19.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting desire-focused explicit companion chat at a budget price | Users wanting seductive voice messages, high-quality NSFW images and chat, and both anime and realistic styles via browser without login gates |
| Not for | Users needing voice, a mobile app, video generation, or emotional relationship depth | Those needing live voice or video calls, crypto billing, or a free trial |
| Operator | Cozyai LLC | Dream Studio USA, Inc. and TEKTOPIA LTD (Cyprus); the iOS app is published by Mindbots LLC |
| Pricing notes | A genuine free tier now exists (casual chat, restricted memory, no image/audio, no NSFW), with paid tiers confirmed via CraveU's own pricing page: Essential ~$4.99-5.99/month, Pro ~$7.99-14.99/month, Ultimate ~$29.99-49.99/month, plus token top-up bundles. This replaces the flat $6.99/month, no-free-tier structure tested originally. Desire-focused NSFW companion. | 1 Month: $19.99. 12 Months: $119.88 ($9.99/mo). |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, CraveU lets you: OurDream.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. OurDream.ai simply does more: nsfw chat, nsfw image generation and seductive voice messages are on its list and not on CraveU's. More features is only better if you will use them.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #39 | ▲#16 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #300,064 | ▲#11,457 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | Top 500,000 | ▲Top 10,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 5,705 | ▲301,181 |
| Search visits a month, US | 2,890 | ▲98,433 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 4,400 | ▲301,000 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 41 | ▲71 |
| Referring domains | 2,250 | ▲4,127 |
| Backlinks | 20,663 | ▲184,582,893 |
| Domain registered | June 2024 | November 2024 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 16 videos, 9 Reddit threads, 11 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, OurDream.ai is the busier site: 301,181 search visits a month worldwide, more than 55 times what CraveU gets (5,705). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 301,000 people a month type OurDream.ai's name, against 4,400 for CraveU. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. OurDream.ai's Domain Rating of 71 against 41 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| SceneSnap image generation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Characters and creator rewards | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users negativeMy test: Disagree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Mobile app | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and billing | Users mixedMy test: Disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Image generation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video generation | – | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Characters and creator community | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Price and Dream Coins | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Safety, legitimacy and apps | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 2 of 10 features positive for CraveU and 3 of 10 features positive for OurDream.ai. OurDream.ai gets it on memory. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for CraveU and 2 points for OurDream.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
CraveU
#39 on the ranking
CraveU is the cheapest way I know to get a picture with every message, and that is both its case and its catch.
Read my full CraveU analysis →OurDream.ai
#16 on the ranking
OurDream AI is the fastest riser I track, and after a month with it I think the rise is earned.
Read my full OurDream.ai analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. CraveU and OurDream.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.