Caveduck
#25 on the ranking
Caveduck is a roleplay platform first and a companion site second, and it is good at the first.
Read my full Caveduck analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
Caveduck leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | No | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | $5.99/mo | $9.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Anime fans wanting extensive character variety and NSFW roleplay capability at a budget price | Users who want a feature-rich companion platform at a budget price with strong chat and image quality |
| Not for | Users wanting realistic character aesthetics, voice interaction, or a mobile app | Those who need reliable live voice calls or a usable free tier to test the experience |
| Operator | WarpSpace (Warp Space Global Inc.), CEO Kim Young-bin | DreamAI SRL |
| Pricing notes | Free tier available. Paid from $5.99/month for full access. | Tiered plans starting at Bronze $9.99/mo, up through Silver $19.99/mo, Gold $49.99/mo, and Diamond $99.99/mo, each raising the messages, images, video, and voice credit allowances. Roughly 10% off with a 3-month commitment. Token system for additional features. Cryptocurrency accepted. |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, DreamGF lets you: Caveduck asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. Caveduck is the cheaper way in at $5.99/mo against $9.99/mo for DreamGF. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. DreamGF simply does more: custom character creation, nsfw chat and image generation and voice messages are on its list and not on Caveduck's. More features is only better if you will use them.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #25 | ▲#8 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | #53 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | ▲#56,089 | #287,472 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | ▲Top 50,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲100,008 | 4,657 |
| Search visits a month, US | ▲11,543 | 2,849 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲18,100 | 2,900 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 43 | ▲60 |
| Referring domains | 2,477 | ▲3,172 |
| Backlinks | 30,755 | ▲152,898 |
| Domain registered | April 2023 | March 2023 |
| Public record I read | 2 videos, 8 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 4 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 2 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, DreamGF is there at #53; Caveduck does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why DreamGF sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, Caveduck is the busier site: 100,008 search visits a month worldwide, more than 20 times what DreamGF gets (4,657). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 18,100 people a month type Caveduck's name, against 2,900 for DreamGF. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. DreamGF's Domain Rating of 60 against 43 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. In plain terms: Caveduck is bigger, DreamGF is the one the category search points to.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Model choice | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Characters and creator tools | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users mixedMy test: Disagree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and points | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and billing | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Characters and customisation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Price and renewal | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Tokens | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with Caveduck: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against DreamGF's 2 of 10, with 3 features where the complaints win. Where they split, Caveduck gets the better word on chat and roleplay and safety and legitimacy. DreamGF gets it on image generation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for Caveduck and 1 point for DreamGF, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Caveduck
#25 on the ranking
Caveduck is a roleplay platform first and a companion site second, and it is good at the first.
Read my full Caveduck analysis →DreamGF
#8 on the ranking
DreamGF has the deepest character builder I have used and the pricing structure I would least recommend.
Read my full DreamGF analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Caveduck and DreamGF are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.