SoulFun
#57 on the ranking
SoulFun is a 2024 success that has lost nine-tenths of its audience, and after a month with it I understand both halves of that sentence.
Read my full SoulFun analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
HeraHaven leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $19.95/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Filtered or limited |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting a complete companion package, voice, mobile, memory, and NSFW, with crypto privacy | Users who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability |
| Not for | Users on a budget or those who primarily need image generation quality | Those who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support |
| Operator | Not disclosed: the terms, privacy policy and subscription terms name only 'SoulFun' and the copyright line reads 'SoulFun.ai', with no company name or address | Vilala Limited |
| Pricing notes | Free 30-day unlimited text-only trial (no photos, voice, or video), then $19.99/month, or $119.99/year (about $9.99/month). iOS and Android available. Crypto accepted (BTC, USDT). | 1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. HeraHaven simply does more: immersive ai chat with memory, nsfw capability and image generation are on its list and not on SoulFun's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: SoulFun allows it on paid plans, HeraHaven keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #57 | ▲#42 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #2,844,901 | ▲#405,892 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | – | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 2,207 | ▲118,642 |
| Search visits a month, US | 1,237 | ▲29,751 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 260 | ▲5,400 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 48 | ▲52 |
| Referring domains | 967 | ▲2,446 |
| Backlinks | ▲78,291 | 19,209 |
| Domain registered | December 2023 | June 2024 |
| Public record I read | 3 videos, 4 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, HeraHaven is the busier site: 118,642 search visits a month worldwide, more than 55 times what SoulFun gets (2,207). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 5,400 people a month type HeraHaven's name, against 260 for SoulFun. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. SoulFun is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Memory | Users negativeMy test: Disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Voice calls | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Video chat and video generation | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Images | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Price and coins | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and billing | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Image generation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice messages and live calls | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Companion builder | – | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Price and tokens | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Customer support | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Legitimacy and access | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 2 of 10 features positive for SoulFun and 3 of 10 features positive for HeraHaven. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for SoulFun and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
SoulFun
#57 on the ranking
SoulFun is a 2024 success that has lost nine-tenths of its audience, and after a month with it I understand both halves of that sentence.
Read my full SoulFun analysis →HeraHaven
#42 on the ranking
HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.
Read my full HeraHaven analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. SoulFun and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.