Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

AIGirlfriends.ai logovsHeraHaven logo

AIGirlfriends.ai vs HeraHaven

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

AIGirlfriends.ai leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

AIGirlfriends.ai logoHeraHaven logo
Rank on this site▲#1#42
Google US, “ai girlfriend”#1–
Search visits a month▲254K119K
Name searches a month, US70▲5.4K

In short

AIGirlfriends.ai is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • AIGirlfriends.ai ranks #1 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; HeraHaven holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#1 against #42 on this site).
  • AIGirlfriends.ai gets about 254,494 search visits a month worldwide against 118,642 for HeraHaven, roughly 2.1 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for HeraHaven by name about 5,400 times a month in the US, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai.
  • AIGirlfriends.ai has no free tier and starts at $9.99/mo; HeraHaven has a free tier and paid plans from $19.95/mo.
  • AIGirlfriends.ai allows adult content on paid plans; HeraHaven filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerAIGirlfriends.aiHeraHaven
Free tierNo▲Yes
Entry paid plan$9.99/mo$19.95/mo
Adult contentAllowed on paid plansFiltered or limited
Features
  • Text chat with memory
  • AI-generated images
  • Video generation
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calls
  • Character creation
  • News feed
  • NSFW content
  • Immersive AI chat with memory
  • NSFW capability
  • Image generation
  • Voice messaging
  • Live voice calls
  • Free tier access
  • Character creation
  • Crypto payments
Best forUsers who want the most complete AI girlfriend experience, chat, voice, images, and video, at the best price in the categoryUsers who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability
Not forUsers who only want a simple text-chat companion without multimedia featuresThose who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support
OperatorAi Horizon Inc.Vilala Limited
Pricing notesFree trial available to try the core chat experience before subscribing, but there's no persistent free tier. 1 Month: $9.99. 3 Months: $23.97 ($7.99/mo). 12 Months: $71.88 ($5.99/mo). One-off credit purchases also available without a full subscription. Cryptocurrency accepted.1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted.

My take

If you want to try before you pay, HeraHaven lets you: AIGirlfriends.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. AIGirlfriends.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $19.95/mo for HeraHaven. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. On adult content they are not the same product: AIGirlfriends.ai allows it on paid plans, HeraHaven keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersAIGirlfriends.aiHeraHaven
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site▲#1#42
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026#1–
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains#633,137▲#405,892
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX ReportTop 500,000Top 500,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate▲254,494118,642
Search visits a month, US▲106,84829,751
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO70▲5,400
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10033▲52
Referring domains393▲2,446
Backlinks2,014▲19,209
Domain registeredAugust 2023June 2024
Public record I read0 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 1 articles3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, AIGirlfriends.ai is there at #1; HeraHaven does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why AIGirlfriends.ai sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, AIGirlfriends.ai is the busier site: 254,494 search visits a month worldwide, about twice what HeraHaven gets (118,642). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 5,400 people a month type HeraHaven's name, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there HeraHaven comes out ahead (#405,892 against #633,137). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. HeraHaven's Domain Rating of 52 against 33 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. AIGirlfriends.ai is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: AIGirlfriends.ai is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureAIGirlfriends.aiHeraHaven
Chat and roleplayUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Image generationUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Voice calls and messagesUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
VideoUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
News feedUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Characters and customisationUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Free trialUsers negativeMy test: Agree–
Price and creditsUsers positiveMy test: Partly disagree–
Privacy, billing and legitimacyUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Voice messages and live calls–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Companion builder–Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree
Free tier–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Price and tokens–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Customer support–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Privacy and billing–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Legitimacy and access–Users mixedMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users are happier with AIGirlfriends.ai: 6 of its 10 features come out positive, against HeraHaven's 3 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. Where they split, AIGirlfriends.ai gets the better word on chat and roleplay. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for AIGirlfriends.ai and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

AIGirlfriends.ai logo

AIGirlfriends.ai

#1 on the ranking

AIGirlfriends.ai does more, and does it well, than any site I tested at its price: voice calls that feel alive, generated video that keeps the likeness, realistic images, a deep character builder and a news feed that gives the companion a life between chats.

Read my full AIGirlfriends.ai analysis →
HeraHaven logo

HeraHaven

#42 on the ranking

HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.

Read my full HeraHaven analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. AIGirlfriends.ai and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.