Nastia
#35 on the ranking
Nastia is the last unrestricted companion platform with a community, and the numbers show people arriving for exactly that reason.
Read my full Nastia analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
Nastia leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $19.95/mo |
| Adult content | Filtered or limited | Filtered or limited |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting an empathetic, emotionally supportive AI companion for genuine connection | Users who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability |
| Not for | Users primarily seeking explicit NSFW content or a feature-heavy platform (image/video generation is now available, but only on the top tier) | Those who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support |
| Operator | Nastia Cybernetics SAS | Vilala Limited |
| Pricing notes | Free plan with a daily token allowance, Basic at $11.99/month ($7.33/month billed yearly), Unlimited at $15.99/month ($8.33/month billed yearly, adds image/video generation). Browser-based access. | 1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. HeraHaven simply does more: immersive ai chat with memory, nsfw capability and image generation are on its list and not on Nastia's. More features is only better if you will use them.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | ▲#35 | #42 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | ▲#127,013 | #405,892 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | ▲Top 100,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲385,494 | 118,642 |
| Search visits a month, US | ▲113,167 | 29,751 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲27,100 | 5,400 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 50 | ▲52 |
| Referring domains | ▲2,541 | 2,446 |
| Backlinks | 13,068 | ▲19,209 |
| Domain registered | January 2023 | June 2024 |
| Public record I read | 6 videos, 10 Reddit threads, 1 articles | 3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, Nastia is the busier site: 385,494 search visits a month worldwide, about three times what HeraHaven gets (118,642). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 27,100 people a month type Nastia's name, against 5,400 for HeraHaven. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Nastia is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video generation | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice | Users negativeMy test: Disagree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and billing | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Operator and support | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice messages and live calls | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Companion builder | – | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Customer support | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Legitimacy and access | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 3 of 10 features positive for Nastia and 3 of 10 features positive for HeraHaven. Where they split, Nastia gets the better word on free tier and privacy and billing. HeraHaven gets it on image generation and price and tokens. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for Nastia and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Nastia
#35 on the ranking
Nastia is the last unrestricted companion platform with a community, and the numbers show people arriving for exactly that reason.
Read my full Nastia analysis →HeraHaven
#42 on the ranking
HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.
Read my full HeraHaven analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Nastia and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.