MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
JOI leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | $9.99/mo | $13.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Filtered or limited |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companion | Users seeking image generation and AI companion features at a budget-friendly price point |
| Not for | Users preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment options | Users who need extensive community resources or detailed feature documentation before committing |
| Operator | Not disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact email | JOI AI (as the site's footer puts it); one third-party review names JOI-AI Limited, a UK-registered company, which the site itself does not confirm |
| Pricing notes | A free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments. | 1 Month: $13.99. 3 Months: $20.99 (~$7/mo). 12 Months: $47.99 (~$4/mo). Premium adds image generation and a limited video generation allowance (5 free clips/month, extra via Neurons). |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, MiniApps.ai lets you: JOI asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. MiniApps.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $13.99/mo for JOI. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. MiniApps.ai simply does more: nsfw chat with emotional escalation, nsfw voice messages and nsfw live call functionality are on its list and not on JOI's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: MiniApps.ai allows it on paid plans, JOI keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #31 | ▲#19 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #103,285 | ▲#31,348 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | Top 100,000 | ▲Top 50,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲119,758 | 34,016 |
| Search visits a month, US | ▲20,680 | 12,053 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 6,600 | ▲33,100 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 36 | ▲64 |
| Referring domains | ▲3,147 | 2,966 |
| Backlinks | 30,865 | ▲62,387 |
| Domain registered | March 2023 | July 2003 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 10 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 6 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, MiniApps.ai is the busier site: 119,758 search visits a month worldwide, about 4 times what JOI gets (34,016). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 33,100 people a month type JOI's name, against 6,600 for MiniApps.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there JOI comes out ahead (#31,348 against #103,285). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. JOI's Domain Rating of 64 against 36 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. JOI is the older domain (2003 against 2023), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice and calls | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and credits | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Content filter | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and safety | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Community and support | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Model switching | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Images and Dream Clips | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Voice | – | Users mixedMy test: Disagree |
| Price and neurons | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and billing | – | Users mixedMy test: Disagree |
| Safety and legitimacy | – | Users mixed |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with MiniApps.ai: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against JOI's 2 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. Where they split, MiniApps.ai gets the better word on free tier. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 3 points for JOI, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →JOI
#19 on the ranking
Joi is the loudest newcomer in the category, and after a month with it the product is better than the marketing deserves.
Read my full JOI analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and JOI are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.