Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

MiniApps.ai logovsJOI logo

MiniApps.ai vs JOI

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

JOI leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

MiniApps.ai logoJOI logo
Rank on this site#31▲#19
Google US, “ai girlfriend”––
Search visits a month▲120K34.0K
Name searches a month, US6.6K▲33.1K

In short

MiniApps.ai is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • MiniApps.ai gets about 119,758 search visits a month worldwide against 34,016 for JOI, roughly 3.5 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for JOI by name about 33,100 times a month in the US, against 6,600 for MiniApps.ai.
  • MiniApps.ai has a free tier and paid plans from $9.99/mo; JOI has no free tier and starts at $13.99/mo.
  • MiniApps.ai allows adult content on paid plans; JOI filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerMiniApps.aiJOI
Free tier▲YesNo
Entry paid plan$9.99/mo$13.99/mo
Adult contentAllowed on paid plansFiltered or limited
Features
  • NSFW chat with emotional escalation
  • NSFW voice messages
  • NSFW live call functionality
  • Personality customization
  • Realistic character focus
  • Discord community
  • AI girlfriend chat
  • Image generation
  • Flexible pricing tiers
Best forUsers seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companionUsers seeking image generation and AI companion features at a budget-friendly price point
Not forUsers preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment optionsUsers who need extensive community resources or detailed feature documentation before committing
OperatorNot disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact emailJOI AI (as the site's footer puts it); one third-party review names JOI-AI Limited, a UK-registered company, which the site itself does not confirm
Pricing notesA free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments.1 Month: $13.99. 3 Months: $20.99 (~$7/mo). 12 Months: $47.99 (~$4/mo). Premium adds image generation and a limited video generation allowance (5 free clips/month, extra via Neurons).

My take

If you want to try before you pay, MiniApps.ai lets you: JOI asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. MiniApps.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $13.99/mo for JOI. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. MiniApps.ai simply does more: nsfw chat with emotional escalation, nsfw voice messages and nsfw live call functionality are on its list and not on JOI's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: MiniApps.ai allows it on paid plans, JOI keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersMiniApps.aiJOI
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#31▲#19
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026––
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains#103,285▲#31,348
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX ReportTop 100,000▲Top 50,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate▲119,75834,016
Search visits a month, US▲20,68012,053
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO6,600▲33,100
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10036▲64
Referring domains▲3,1472,966
Backlinks30,865▲62,387
Domain registeredMarch 2023July 2003
Public record I read1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles10 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 6 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, MiniApps.ai is the busier site: 119,758 search visits a month worldwide, about 4 times what JOI gets (34,016). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 33,100 people a month type JOI's name, against 6,600 for MiniApps.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there JOI comes out ahead (#31,348 against #103,285). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. JOI's Domain Rating of 64 against 36 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. JOI is the older domain (2003 against 2023), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureMiniApps.aiJOI
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
Image generationUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Voice and callsUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Characters and customisationUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Free tierUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers negativeMy test: Agree
Price and creditsUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Content filterUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Privacy and safetyUsers negativeMy test: Partly disagree–
Community and supportUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Model switching–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Images and Dream Clips–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Voice–Users mixedMy test: Disagree
Price and neurons–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Privacy and billing–Users mixedMy test: Disagree
Safety and legitimacy–Users mixed

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users are happier with MiniApps.ai: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against JOI's 2 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. Where they split, MiniApps.ai gets the better word on free tier. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 3 points for JOI, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

MiniApps.ai logo

MiniApps.ai

#31 on the ranking

MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.

Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →
JOI logo

JOI

#19 on the ranking

Joi is the loudest newcomer in the category, and after a month with it the product is better than the marketing deserves.

Read my full JOI analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and JOI are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.