Luvr.ai
#7 on the ranking
Luvr AI is a good scenario-roleplay site, and that has little to do with where it ranks for 'ai girlfriend'.
Read my full Luvr.ai analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
Kupid.ai leads on 4 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $17.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users who want a romantic AI companion that genuinely builds and remembers a relationship over time | Users seeking deep, text-based emotional connection with immersive visuals who can tolerate slower response times |
| Not for | Users wanting voice, image generation, a mobile app, or quick explicit content access | Those who prioritize real-time voice interaction or need responsive customer support |
| Operator | LUVR INC. (site footer; no address given) | SNB Technologies Limited |
| Pricing notes | A free tier (150 starter coins) now exists, with a Gold tier around $9.99-12.99/month, Platinum at $39.99/month, and an annual plan lowering the effective rate to around $5.99/month. Browser-based access. | Plans are now monthly-only, starting around $17.99/mo (unlimited messages plus a set image/voice allowance) and scaling up through mid tiers to roughly $49.99/mo for unlimited images and voice plus video-generation coins. Cryptocurrency accepted. Coins/credits available for one-off feature purchases including video. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. Kupid.ai simply does more: nsfw content, image generation and voice messages are on its list and not on Luvr.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #7 | ▲#3 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | #39 | ▲#7 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #2,762,931 | ▲#254,630 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | – | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 8,689 | ▲131,142 |
| Search visits a month, US | 2,834 | ▲31,822 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 1,600 | ▲5,400 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 52 | ▲73 |
| Referring domains | 776 | ▲3,424 |
| Backlinks | 2,468 | ▲437,714 |
| Domain registered | December 2023 | June 2023 |
| Public record I read | 2 videos, 0 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 6 videos, 0 Reddit threads, 2 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. For the search "ai girlfriend" in the US, Kupid.ai is at #7 and Luvr.ai at #39, so Kupid.ai is the one more newcomers find first. Page one is positions 1 to 10; anything past that is traffic you have to earn by name. On size, Kupid.ai is the busier site: 131,142 search visits a month worldwide, more than 15 times what Luvr.ai gets (8,689). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 5,400 people a month type Kupid.ai's name, against 1,600 for Luvr.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Kupid.ai's Domain Rating of 73 against 52 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. In plain terms: Kupid.ai is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Video | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Voice | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free tier | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| NSFW and restrictions | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy, billing and legitimacy | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Proactive messaging | – | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Price and billing | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and legitimacy | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 3 of 10 features positive for Luvr.ai and 3 of 10 features positive for Kupid.ai. Kupid.ai gets it on voice. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for Luvr.ai and 2 points for Kupid.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Luvr.ai
#7 on the ranking
Luvr AI is a good scenario-roleplay site, and that has little to do with where it ranks for 'ai girlfriend'.
Read my full Luvr.ai analysis →Kupid.ai
#3 on the ranking
Kupid AI has the best voice and one of the best conversations in the category, and the worst way of charging for them.
Read my full Kupid.ai analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Luvr.ai and Kupid.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.