Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

RushChat logovsCandy AI logo

RushChat vs Candy AI

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

Candy AI leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

RushChat logoCandy AI logo
Rank on this site#53▲#5
Google US, “ai girlfriend”–#11
Search visits a month349▲592K
Name searches a month, US480▲301K

In short

Candy AI is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • Candy AI ranks #11 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; RushChat holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#5 against #53 on this site).
  • Candy AI gets about 592,075 search visits a month worldwide against 349 for RushChat, roughly 1696 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for Candy AI by name about 301,000 times a month in the US, against 480 for RushChat.
  • RushChat has a free tier and paid plans from $12.99/mo; Candy AI has no free tier and starts at $13.99/mo.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerRushChatCandy AI
Free tier▲YesNo
Entry paid plan$12.99/mo$13.99/mo
Adult contentAllowed on paid plansAllowed on paid plans
Features
  • iOS and Android mobile apps
  • Daily engagement streaks and affection system
  • Flirtatious and NSFW-suggestive chat
  • Multiple AI companion personas
  • NSFW chat and image generation
  • Character customization
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calling
  • Memory retention across sessions
  • Image customization
  • Crypto payments
Best forMobile users wanting a gamified companion app for daily check-ins and flirty chatUsers wanting a widely recognized platform with expressive chat and flexible pricing who can tolerate slower response speeds
Not forUsers seeking fully explicit NSFW, voice interaction, or deep desktop-based sessionsThose who need real-time live calling or a strong free tier to evaluate before paying
OperatorStayone Technology Pte. Ltd. (named in the site's footer)EverAI Limited
Pricing notesA free tier now exists (30 messages/day, 1 image). Premium confirmed unchanged at $12.99/month (unlimited messages, 100 images/mo). A new Deluxe tier has also been added at $43.99/month (2,000 images/mo, HD downloads, exclusive characters). Available on iOS and Android.1 Month: $13.99. 3 Months: ~$26.97 (~$8.99/mo). 12 Months: ~$47.88 (~$3.99/mo). Tokens (used for voice, images, and video) are included per tier with add-on packs available. Cryptocurrency payments accepted.

My take

If you want to try before you pay, RushChat lets you: Candy AI asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. RushChat is the cheaper way in at $12.99/mo against $13.99/mo for Candy AI. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. Candy AI simply does more: nsfw chat and image generation, character customization and voice messages are on its list and not on RushChat's. More features is only better if you will use them.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersRushChatCandy AI
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#53▲#5
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026–#11
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains#1,278,535▲#12,246
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX ReportTop 1,000,000▲Top 10,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate349▲592,075
Search visits a month, US198▲116,063
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO480▲301,000
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10029▲76
Referring domains1,033▲4,683
Backlinks4,680▲127,630,165
Domain registeredMay 2024December 2017
Public record I read3 videos, 0 Reddit threads, 0 articles17 videos, 8 Reddit threads, 10 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, Candy AI is there at #11; RushChat does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why Candy AI sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, Candy AI is the busier site: 592,075 search visits a month worldwide, more than 1695 times what RushChat gets (349). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 301,000 people a month type Candy AI's name, against 480 for RushChat. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Candy AI's Domain Rating of 76 against 29 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. Candy AI is the older domain (2017 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: Candy AI is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureRushChatCandy AI
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Image generationUsers negativeMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
VoiceUsers negativeMy test: Disagree–
Characters and customisationUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Daily streaks and affectionUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Free tierUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers negativeMy test: Agree
PriceUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Privacy and billingUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Support and communityUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree–
Voice calls–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Video ('Live Action')–Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree
Price and tokens–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Safety and legitimacy–Users positiveMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users are happier with Candy AI: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against RushChat's 1 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. Candy AI gets it on memory, image generation and characters and customisation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for RushChat and 1 point for Candy AI, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

RushChat logo

RushChat

#53 on the ranking

RushChat is a polished phone-first companion app with a daily streak loop, and the public record on it is empty.

Read my full RushChat analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. RushChat and Candy AI are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.