Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

Angel.ai logovsCandy AI logo

Angel.ai vs Candy AI

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

Candy AI leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

Angel.ai logoCandy AI logo
Rank on this site#59▲#5
Google US, “ai girlfriend”–#11
Search visits a month507▲592K
Name searches a month, US1.3K▲301K

In short

Candy AI is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • Candy AI ranks #11 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; Angel.ai holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#5 against #59 on this site).
  • Candy AI gets about 592,075 search visits a month worldwide against 507 for Angel.ai, roughly 1168 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for Candy AI by name about 301,000 times a month in the US, against 1,300 for Angel.ai.
  • Angel.ai has a free tier and paid plans from Free; Candy AI has no free tier and starts at $13.99/mo.
  • Candy AI allows adult content on paid plans; Angel.ai filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerAngel.aiCandy AI
Free tier▲YesNo
Entry paid planFree$13.99/mo
Adult contentFiltered or limitedAllowed on paid plans
Features
  • Emotionally supportive AI companion design
  • Warm, empathetic conversation
  • Cross-session emotional memory
  • Cryptocurrency payments
  • NSFW chat and image generation
  • Character customization
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calling
  • Memory retention across sessions
  • Image customization
  • Crypto payments
Best forUsers wanting an emotionally supportive AI companion for encouragement and genuine connection at a budget priceUsers wanting a widely recognized platform with expressive chat and flexible pricing who can tolerate slower response speeds
Not forUsers seeking explicit NSFW content, video generation, live voice calls, or a mobile appThose who need real-time live calling or a strong free tier to evaluate before paying
OperatorOpen Spark Pte. Ltd. (named in the terms of service and privacy policy); the home page footer says 'OPEN SPARK AI, INC.'EverAI Limited
Pricing notesFree tier now available (limited). Paid tiers: Weekly $4.99, Monthly $9.99, Annual $49.99 (per Angel.ai's own subscribe page); one third-party source cites lower promotional rates. Browser-based. Cryptocurrency reportedly accepted via Stripe per a third-party source, not confirmed directly on-site.1 Month: $13.99. 3 Months: ~$26.97 (~$8.99/mo). 12 Months: ~$47.88 (~$3.99/mo). Tokens (used for voice, images, and video) are included per tier with add-on packs available. Cryptocurrency payments accepted.

My take

If you want to try before you pay, Angel.ai lets you: Candy AI asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. Candy AI simply does more: nsfw chat and image generation, character customization and voice messages are on its list and not on Angel.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: Candy AI allows it on paid plans, Angel.ai keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersAngel.aiCandy AI
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#59▲#5
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026–#11
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains#3,536,324▲#12,246
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report–Top 10,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate507▲592,075
Search visits a month, US382▲116,063
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO1,300▲301,000
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10024▲76
Referring domains344▲4,683
Backlinks3,516▲127,630,165
Domain registeredFebruary 2018December 2017
Public record I read6 videos, 1 Reddit threads, 0 articles17 videos, 8 Reddit threads, 10 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, Candy AI is there at #11; Angel.ai does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why Candy AI sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, Candy AI is the busier site: 592,075 search visits a month worldwide, more than 1170 times what Angel.ai gets (507). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 301,000 people a month type Candy AI's name, against 1,300 for Angel.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Candy AI's Domain Rating of 76 against 24 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. Candy AI is the older domain (2017 against 2018), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: Candy AI is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureAngel.aiCandy AI
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
MemoryUsers negativeMy test: DisagreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Image generationUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Characters and customisationUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
VoiceUsers negativeMy test: Agree–
Free tierUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers negativeMy test: Agree
Price and billingUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Privacy and legitimacyUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Support and cancellationUsers negativeMy test: Agree–
FindabilityUsers negativeMy test: Agree–
Voice calls–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Video ('Live Action')–Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree
Price and tokens–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Privacy and billing–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Safety and legitimacy–Users positiveMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users are happier with Candy AI: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against Angel.ai's 1 of 10, with 4 features where the complaints win. Candy AI gets it on memory and characters and customisation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for Angel.ai and 1 point for Candy AI, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

Angel.ai logo

Angel.ai

#59 on the ranking

Angel.ai is a small Singapore-run girlfriend site that shares its name with a mortgage company's ten-million-view ad campaign, and after a month with it the product is plainer than the name.

Read my full Angel.ai analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Angel.ai and Candy AI are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.