Replika
#30 on the ranking
Replika is the original AI companion, and after a month with it I understand both the loyalty and the decline.
Read my full Replika analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
AIGirlfriends.ai leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | $19.99/mo | $9.99/mo |
| Adult content | Filtered or limited | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users who want emotional connection, natural conversation, and voice interaction with a single consistent companion | Users who want the most complete AI girlfriend experience, chat, voice, images, and video, at the best price in the category |
| Not for | Those wanting NSFW image generation, anime-style companions, character customization, or explicit adult content | Users who only want a simple text-chat companion without multimedia features |
| Operator | Luka, Inc. | Ai Horizon Inc. |
| Pricing notes | Pro: $19.99/mo (~$5.83/mo yearly). Ultra: $29.99/mo (~$119.99/yr), adds improved memory and conversation quality. Platinum (highest tier, price not published) adds selfie video generation and real-time video recognition. No crypto payments. | Free trial available to try the core chat experience before subscribing, but there's no persistent free tier. 1 Month: $9.99. 3 Months: $23.97 ($7.99/mo). 12 Months: $71.88 ($5.99/mo). One-off credit purchases also available without a full subscription. Cryptocurrency accepted. |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, Replika lets you: AIGirlfriends.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. AIGirlfriends.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $19.99/mo for Replika. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. AIGirlfriends.ai simply does more: text chat with memory, ai-generated images and video generation are on its list and not on Replika's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: AIGirlfriends.ai allows it on paid plans, Replika keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #30 | ▲#1 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | #1 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | ▲#89,382 | #633,137 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | Top 500,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 47,230 | ▲254,494 |
| Search visits a month, US | 16,134 | ▲106,848 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲14,800 | 70 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | ▲76 | 33 |
| Referring domains | ▲9,348 | 393 |
| Backlinks | ▲68,381 | 2,014 |
| Domain registered | February 2004 | August 2023 |
| Public record I read | 19 videos, 10 Reddit threads, 24 articles | 0 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 1 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, AIGirlfriends.ai is there at #1; Replika does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why AIGirlfriends.ai sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, AIGirlfriends.ai is the busier site: 254,494 search visits a month worldwide, about 5 times what Replika gets (47,230). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 14,800 people a month type Replika's name, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there Replika comes out ahead (#89,382 against #633,137). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. Replika's Domain Rating of 76 against 33 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. Replika is the older domain (2004 against 2023), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: AIGirlfriends.ai is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and small talk | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Memory | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Voice and video calls | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Images and selfies | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Avatar, room and VR | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Romance and content rules | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Price and tiers | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Privacy and data | Users negativeMy test: Agree | – |
| Safety and emotional design | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Chat and roleplay | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice calls and messages | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| News feed | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Characters and customisation | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free trial | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and credits | – | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Privacy, billing and legitimacy | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with AIGirlfriends.ai: 6 of its 10 features come out positive, against Replika's 2 of 10, with 5 features where the complaints win. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for Replika and 2 points for AIGirlfriends.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Replika
#30 on the ranking
Replika is the original AI companion, and after a month with it I understand both the loyalty and the decline.
Read my full Replika analysis →AIGirlfriends.ai
#1 on the ranking
AIGirlfriends.ai does more, and does it well, than any site I tested at its price: voice calls that feel alive, generated video that keeps the likeness, realistic images, a deep character builder and a news feed that gives the companion a life between chats.
Read my full AIGirlfriends.ai analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Replika and AIGirlfriends.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.