Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

Nomi.ai logovsAIGirlfriends.ai logo

Nomi.ai vs AIGirlfriends.ai

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

AIGirlfriends.ai leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

Nomi.ai logoAIGirlfriends.ai logo
Rank on this site#4▲#1
Google US, “ai girlfriend”#9▲#1
Search visits a month50.0K▲254K
Name searches a month, US▲33.1K70

In short

AIGirlfriends.ai is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • For the search "ai girlfriend" in the United States, AIGirlfriends.ai ranks #1 and Nomi.ai #9, which is why AIGirlfriends.ai sits higher on this site's ranking (#1 against #4).
  • AIGirlfriends.ai gets about 254,494 search visits a month worldwide against 50,007 for Nomi.ai, roughly 5.1 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for Nomi.ai by name about 33,100 times a month in the US, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai.
  • Nomi.ai has a free tier and paid plans from Free; AIGirlfriends.ai has no free tier and starts at $9.99/mo.
  • AIGirlfriends.ai allows adult content on paid plans; Nomi.ai filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerNomi.aiAIGirlfriends.ai
Free tier▲YesNo
Entry paid planFree$9.99/mo
Adult contentFiltered or limitedAllowed on paid plans
Features
  • Deep long-term memory across all conversations
  • High emotional intelligence and empathy
  • Relationship continuity over time
  • Mood-adaptive communication style
  • Text chat with memory
  • AI-generated images
  • Video generation
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calls
  • Character creation
  • News feed
  • NSFW content
Best forUsers who want a genuinely emotionally intelligent AI companion with real persistent memoryUsers who want the most complete AI girlfriend experience, chat, voice, images, and video, at the best price in the category
Not forUsers primarily seeking robust image generation, a mobile app, or explicit NSFW contentUsers who only want a simple text-chat companion without multimedia features
OperatorGlimpse.ai, Inc. (a Maryland corporation; named in the Nomi.ai terms of service and privacy policy)Ai Horizon Inc.
Pricing notesFree tier with limited daily messages and one companion. Paid plans from $15.99/month ($39.99/quarter, $99.99/year). Video generation billed separately via credits. Browser-based access.Free trial available to try the core chat experience before subscribing, but there's no persistent free tier. 1 Month: $9.99. 3 Months: $23.97 ($7.99/mo). 12 Months: $71.88 ($5.99/mo). One-off credit purchases also available without a full subscription. Cryptocurrency accepted.

My take

If you want to try before you pay, Nomi.ai lets you: AIGirlfriends.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. AIGirlfriends.ai simply does more: text chat with memory, ai-generated images and video generation are on its list and not on Nomi.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: AIGirlfriends.ai allows it on paid plans, Nomi.ai keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersNomi.aiAIGirlfriends.ai
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#4▲#1
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026#9▲#1
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains▲#131,225#633,137
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX ReportTop 500,000Top 500,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate50,007▲254,494
Search visits a month, US12,256▲106,848
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO▲33,10070
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100▲6533
Referring domains▲2,161393
Backlinks▲19,2612,014
Domain registeredNovember 2020August 2023
Public record I read15 videos, 8 Reddit threads, 3 articles0 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 1 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. For the search "ai girlfriend" in the US, AIGirlfriends.ai is at #1 and Nomi.ai at #9, so AIGirlfriends.ai is the one more newcomers find first. Page one is positions 1 to 10; anything past that is traffic you have to earn by name. On size, AIGirlfriends.ai is the busier site: 254,494 search visits a month worldwide, about 5 times what Nomi.ai gets (50,007). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 33,100 people a month type Nomi.ai's name, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there Nomi.ai comes out ahead (#131,225 against #633,137). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. Nomi.ai's Domain Rating of 65 against 33 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. Nomi.ai is the older domain (2020 against 2023), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: AIGirlfriends.ai is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureNomi.aiAIGirlfriends.ai
Chat and roleplayUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
MemoryUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
Group chats and multiple NomisUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Selfies and artUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
VoiceUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Free tierUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree–
Price and planUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Content freedom and moderationUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree–
Privacy and dataUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Developer trust and update paceUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Image generation–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Voice calls and messages–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Video–Users mixedMy test: Agree
News feed–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Characters and customisation–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Free trial–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Price and credits–Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree
Privacy, billing and legitimacy–Users mixedMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users rate them about the same: 5 of 10 features positive for Nomi.ai and 6 of 10 features positive for AIGirlfriends.ai. Where they split, Nomi.ai gets the better word on memory. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for Nomi.ai and 2 points for AIGirlfriends.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

Nomi.ai logo

Nomi.ai

#4 on the ranking

Nomi is the companion app for people who want to be remembered, and after a month with it I rank its memory above anything else I have tested.

Read my full Nomi.ai analysis →
AIGirlfriends.ai logo

AIGirlfriends.ai

#1 on the ranking

AIGirlfriends.ai does more, and does it well, than any site I tested at its price: voice calls that feel alive, generated video that keeps the likeness, realistic images, a deep character builder and a news feed that gives the companion a life between chats.

Read my full AIGirlfriends.ai analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Nomi.ai and AIGirlfriends.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.