Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

Nastia logovsAIGirlfriends.ai logo

Nastia vs AIGirlfriends.ai

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

Nastia leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

Nastia logoAIGirlfriends.ai logo
Rank on this site#35▲#1
Google US, “ai girlfriend”–#1
Search visits a month▲385K254K
Name searches a month, US▲27.1K70

In short

Nastia is the bigger site; here is what separates them.

  • AIGirlfriends.ai ranks #1 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; Nastia holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#1 against #35 on this site).
  • Nastia gets about 385,494 search visits a month worldwide against 254,494 for AIGirlfriends.ai, roughly 1.5 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for Nastia by name about 27,100 times a month in the US, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai.
  • Nastia has a free tier and paid plans from Free; AIGirlfriends.ai has no free tier and starts at $9.99/mo.
  • AIGirlfriends.ai allows adult content on paid plans; Nastia filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerNastiaAIGirlfriends.ai
Free tier▲YesNo
Entry paid planFree$9.99/mo
Adult contentFiltered or limitedAllowed on paid plans
Features
  • Emotionally intelligent conversation AI
  • Cross-session emotional memory
  • Mental wellness and support framing
  • Romantic companion mode available
  • Text chat with memory
  • AI-generated images
  • Video generation
  • Voice messages
  • Live voice calls
  • Character creation
  • News feed
  • NSFW content
Best forUsers wanting an empathetic, emotionally supportive AI companion for genuine connectionUsers who want the most complete AI girlfriend experience, chat, voice, images, and video, at the best price in the category
Not forUsers primarily seeking explicit NSFW content or a feature-heavy platform (image/video generation is now available, but only on the top tier)Users who only want a simple text-chat companion without multimedia features
OperatorNastia Cybernetics SASAi Horizon Inc.
Pricing notesFree plan with a daily token allowance, Basic at $11.99/month ($7.33/month billed yearly), Unlimited at $15.99/month ($8.33/month billed yearly, adds image/video generation). Browser-based access.Free trial available to try the core chat experience before subscribing, but there's no persistent free tier. 1 Month: $9.99. 3 Months: $23.97 ($7.99/mo). 12 Months: $71.88 ($5.99/mo). One-off credit purchases also available without a full subscription. Cryptocurrency accepted.

My take

If you want to try before you pay, Nastia lets you: AIGirlfriends.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. AIGirlfriends.ai simply does more: text chat with memory, ai-generated images and video generation are on its list and not on Nastia's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: AIGirlfriends.ai allows it on paid plans, Nastia keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersNastiaAIGirlfriends.ai
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site#35▲#1
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026–#1
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains▲#127,013#633,137
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report▲Top 100,000Top 500,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate▲385,494254,494
Search visits a month, US▲113,167106,848
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO▲27,10070
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100▲5033
Referring domains▲2,541393
Backlinks▲13,0682,014
Domain registeredJanuary 2023August 2023
Public record I read6 videos, 10 Reddit threads, 1 articles0 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 1 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, AIGirlfriends.ai is there at #1; Nastia does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why AIGirlfriends.ai sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, Nastia is the busier site: 385,494 search visits a month worldwide, about half as much again what AIGirlfriends.ai gets (254,494). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 27,100 people a month type Nastia's name, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Nastia's Domain Rating of 50 against 33 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. In plain terms: Nastia is bigger, AIGirlfriends.ai is the one the category search points to.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureNastiaAIGirlfriends.ai
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
Image generationUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Video generationUsers negativeMy test: Agree–
VoiceUsers negativeMy test: Disagree–
Characters and customisationUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Free tierUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Price and tokensUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Privacy and billingUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Operator and supportUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Voice calls and messages–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Video–Users mixedMy test: Agree
News feed–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Free trial–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Price and credits–Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree
Privacy, billing and legitimacy–Users mixedMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users are happier with AIGirlfriends.ai: 6 of its 10 features come out positive, against Nastia's 3 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. AIGirlfriends.ai gets it on chat and roleplay and image generation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 3 points for Nastia and 2 points for AIGirlfriends.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

Nastia logo

Nastia

#35 on the ranking

Nastia is the last unrestricted companion platform with a community, and the numbers show people arriving for exactly that reason.

Read my full Nastia analysis →
AIGirlfriends.ai logo

AIGirlfriends.ai

#1 on the ranking

AIGirlfriends.ai does more, and does it well, than any site I tested at its price: voice calls that feel alive, generated video that keeps the likeness, realistic images, a deep character builder and a news feed that gives the companion a life between chats.

Read my full AIGirlfriends.ai analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. Nastia and AIGirlfriends.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.