MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
MiniApps.ai leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | $9.99/mo | $19.95/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Filtered or limited |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companion | Users who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability |
| Not for | Users preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment options | Those who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support |
| Operator | Not disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact email | Vilala Limited |
| Pricing notes | A free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments. | 1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. MiniApps.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $19.95/mo for HeraHaven. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. HeraHaven simply does more: immersive ai chat with memory, nsfw capability and image generation are on its list and not on MiniApps.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: MiniApps.ai allows it on paid plans, HeraHaven keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | ▲#31 | #42 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | ▲#103,285 | #405,892 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | ▲Top 100,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲119,758 | 118,642 |
| Search visits a month, US | 20,680 | ▲29,751 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲6,600 | 5,400 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 36 | ▲52 |
| Referring domains | ▲3,147 | 2,446 |
| Backlinks | ▲30,865 | 19,209 |
| Domain registered | March 2023 | June 2024 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, MiniApps.ai is the busier site: 119,758 search visits a month worldwide, about the same as HeraHaven gets (118,642). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 6,600 people a month type MiniApps.ai's name, against 5,400 for HeraHaven. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. HeraHaven's Domain Rating of 52 against 36 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. MiniApps.ai is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice and calls | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Price and credits | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Content filter | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and safety | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Community and support | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice messages and live calls | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Companion builder | – | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Price and tokens | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Customer support | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and billing | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Legitimacy and access | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users rate them about the same: 4 of 10 features positive for MiniApps.ai and 3 of 10 features positive for HeraHaven. Where they split, MiniApps.ai gets the better word on free tier. HeraHaven gets it on image generation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →HeraHaven
#42 on the ranking
HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.
Read my full HeraHaven analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.