Skip to content

AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026

MiniApps.ai logovsHeraHaven logo

MiniApps.ai vs HeraHaven

I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.

The scoreboard

MiniApps.ai leads on 3 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.

MiniApps.ai logoHeraHaven logo
Rank on this site▲#31#42
Google US, “ai girlfriend”––
Search visits a month▲120K119K
Name searches a month, US▲6.6K5.4K

In short

Two sites of similar size; here is what separates them.

  • MiniApps.ai gets about 119,758 search visits a month worldwide against 118,642 for HeraHaven (DataForSEO, September 2026).
  • People search for MiniApps.ai by name about 6,600 times a month in the US, against 5,400 for HeraHaven.
  • MiniApps.ai has a free tier and paid plans from $9.99/mo; HeraHaven has a free tier and paid plans from $19.95/mo.
  • MiniApps.ai allows adult content on paid plans; HeraHaven filters or limits it.

What they offer

What they offer
What they offerMiniApps.aiHeraHaven
Free tier▲Yes▲Yes
Entry paid plan$9.99/mo$19.95/mo
Adult contentAllowed on paid plansFiltered or limited
Features
  • NSFW chat with emotional escalation
  • NSFW voice messages
  • NSFW live call functionality
  • Personality customization
  • Realistic character focus
  • Discord community
  • Immersive AI chat with memory
  • NSFW capability
  • Image generation
  • Voice messaging
  • Live voice calls
  • Free tier access
  • Character creation
  • Crypto payments
Best forUsers seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companionUsers who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability
Not forUsers preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment optionsThose who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support
OperatorNot disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact emailVilala Limited
Pricing notesA free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments.1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted.

My take

Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. MiniApps.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $19.95/mo for HeraHaven. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline. HeraHaven simply does more: immersive ai chat with memory, nsfw capability and image generation are on its list and not on MiniApps.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: MiniApps.ai allows it on paid plans, HeraHaven keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.

The numbers

The numbers
The numbersMiniApps.aiHeraHaven
Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site▲#31#42
Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026––
Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains▲#103,285#405,892
Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report▲Top 100,000Top 500,000
Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate▲119,758118,642
Search visits a month, US20,680▲29,751
Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO▲6,6005,400
Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 10036▲52
Referring domains▲3,1472,446
Backlinks▲30,86519,209
Domain registeredMarch 2023June 2024
Public record I read1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles

The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.

My take

None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, MiniApps.ai is the busier site: 119,758 search visits a month worldwide, about the same as HeraHaven gets (118,642). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 6,600 people a month type MiniApps.ai's name, against 5,400 for HeraHaven. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. HeraHaven's Domain Rating of 52 against 36 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. MiniApps.ai is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.

What users say, and what I found

Feature by feature
Feature by featureMiniApps.aiHeraHaven
Chat and roleplayUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagree
MemoryUsers mixedMy test: Partly disagreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Image generationUsers mixedMy test: AgreeUsers positiveMy test: Agree
Voice and callsUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Characters and customisationUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Free tierUsers positiveMy test: AgreeUsers mixedMy test: Agree
Price and creditsUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Content filterUsers positiveMy test: Agree–
Privacy and safetyUsers negativeMy test: Partly disagree–
Community and supportUsers mixedMy test: Agree–
Voice messages and live calls–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Companion builder–Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree
Price and tokens–Users positiveMy test: Agree
Customer support–Users negativeMy test: Agree
Privacy and billing–Users mixedMy test: Agree
Legitimacy and access–Users mixedMy test: Agree

“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.

My take

Users rate them about the same: 4 of 10 features positive for MiniApps.ai and 3 of 10 features positive for HeraHaven. Where they split, MiniApps.ai gets the better word on free tier. HeraHaven gets it on image generation. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.

My verdict on each

MiniApps.ai logo

MiniApps.ai

#31 on the ranking

MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.

Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →
HeraHaven logo

HeraHaven

#42 on the ranking

HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.

Read my full HeraHaven analysis →

Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.