FantasyGF
#13 on the ranking
FantasyGF is a full-featured mid-market companion site that does a bit of everything and nothing memorably.
Read my full FantasyGF analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
FantasyGF vs Candy AI
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
Candy AI leads on 4 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
FantasyGF
Candy AIRank on this site#13▲#5
Google US, “ai girlfriend”#80▲#11
Search visits a month877▲592K
Name searches a month, US1.3K▲301K
In short
Candy AI is the bigger site; here is what separates them.
- For the search "ai girlfriend" in the United States, Candy AI ranks #11 and FantasyGF #80, which is why Candy AI sits higher on this site's ranking (#5 against #13).
- Candy AI gets about 592,075 search visits a month worldwide against 877 for FantasyGF, roughly 675 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
- People search for Candy AI by name about 301,000 times a month in the US, against 1,300 for FantasyGF.
- FantasyGF has a free tier and paid plans from Free; Candy AI has no free tier and starts at $13.99/mo.
What they offer
| What they offer |  FantasyGF |  Candy AI |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $13.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting a feature-rich free-entry NSFW girlfriend experience with voice and image generation | Users wanting a widely recognized platform with expressive chat and flexible pricing who can tolerate slower response speeds |
| Not for | Users requiring a mobile app or needing cross-session memory on the free tier | Those who need real-time live calling or a strong free tier to evaluate before paying |
| Operator | Advanced AI Labs S.R.L. (company number 49734069, named in the site footer; the pricing grid is a near copy of DreamGF's, which is why the two get called sister sites, but the footer names a different Romanian company from DreamGF's DreamAI SRL) | EverAI Limited |
| Pricing notes | Free tier available, though it's more of a limited trial than a fully open plan. Paid plans run $12.99/month, roughly $9.99/month billed quarterly, or roughly $5.99/month billed annually (about $69.99/year), against a listed regular price of $25.99/month. Crypto accepted (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, LTC, SOL, MATIC). Note: fantasygf.ai now redirects to fantasygf.com. | 1 Month: $13.99. 3 Months: ~$26.97 (~$8.99/mo). 12 Months: ~$47.88 (~$3.99/mo). Tokens (used for voice, images, and video) are included per tier with add-on packs available. Cryptocurrency payments accepted. |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, FantasyGF lets you: Candy AI asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. Candy AI simply does more: character customization, voice messages and live voice calling are on its list and not on FantasyGF's. More features is only better if you will use them.
The numbers
| The numbers | FantasyGF | Candy AI |
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #13 | ▲#5 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | #80 | ▲#11 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #726,988 | ▲#12,246 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | – | Top 10,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 877 | ▲592,075 |
| Search visits a month, US | 600 | ▲116,063 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 1,300 | ▲301,000 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 51 | ▲76 |
| Referring domains | 1,283 | ▲4,683 |
| Backlinks | 42,101 | ▲127,630,165 |
| Domain registered | September 2023 | December 2017 |
| Public record I read | 3 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 17 videos, 8 Reddit threads, 10 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. For the search "ai girlfriend" in the US, Candy AI is at #11 and FantasyGF at #80, so Candy AI is the one more newcomers find first. Page one is positions 1 to 10; anything past that is traffic you have to earn by name. On size, Candy AI is the busier site: 592,075 search visits a month worldwide, more than 675 times what FantasyGF gets (877). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 301,000 people a month type Candy AI's name, against 1,300 for FantasyGF. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Candy AI's Domain Rating of 76 against 51 means far more sites link to it, which is what keeps rankings stable; the weaker link profile is the one more likely to move, up or down, when Google reshuffles. Candy AI is the older domain (2017 against 2023), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: Candy AI is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.
What users say, and what I found
| Feature by feature | FantasyGF | Candy AI |
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice messages and calls | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free tier | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and billing | Users mixedMy test: Disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice calls | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Video ('Live Action') | – | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with Candy AI: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against FantasyGF's 1 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. Candy AI gets it on memory, image generation and safety and legitimacy. Both get the same complaint on free tier, so that is a category problem rather than a reason to pick one over the other. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 5 points for FantasyGF and 1 point for Candy AI, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Candy AI
#5 on the ranking
Candy AI is the category's reference point, and after a month with it I understand why.
Read my full Candy AI analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. FantasyGF and Candy AI are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.