MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
MiniApps.ai vs AIGirlfriends.ai
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
AIGirlfriends.ai leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
MiniApps.ai
AIGirlfriends.aiRank on this site#31▲#1
Google US, “ai girlfriend”–#1
Search visits a month120K▲254K
Name searches a month, US▲6.6K70
In short
AIGirlfriends.ai is the bigger site; here is what separates them.
- AIGirlfriends.ai ranks #1 in United States Google results for "ai girlfriend"; MiniApps.ai holds no tracked position for it, so it is placed by all-traffic rank instead (#1 against #31 on this site).
- AIGirlfriends.ai gets about 254,494 search visits a month worldwide against 119,758 for MiniApps.ai, roughly 2.1 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
- People search for MiniApps.ai by name about 6,600 times a month in the US, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai.
- MiniApps.ai has a free tier and paid plans from $9.99/mo; AIGirlfriends.ai has no free tier and starts at $9.99/mo.
What they offer
| What they offer |  MiniApps.ai |  AIGirlfriends.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | $9.99/mo | $9.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companion | Users who want the most complete AI girlfriend experience, chat, voice, images, and video, at the best price in the category |
| Not for | Users preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment options | Users who only want a simple text-chat companion without multimedia features |
| Operator | Not disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact email | Ai Horizon Inc. |
| Pricing notes | A free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments. | Free trial available to try the core chat experience before subscribing, but there's no persistent free tier. 1 Month: $9.99. 3 Months: $23.97 ($7.99/mo). 12 Months: $71.88 ($5.99/mo). One-off credit purchases also available without a full subscription. Cryptocurrency accepted. |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, MiniApps.ai lets you: AIGirlfriends.ai asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. They cost the same to start, $9.99/mo, so the difference is what that money buys. AIGirlfriends.ai simply does more: text chat with memory, ai-generated images and video generation are on its list and not on MiniApps.ai's. More features is only better if you will use them.
The numbers
| The numbers | MiniApps.ai | AIGirlfriends.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #31 | ▲#1 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | #1 |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | ▲#103,285 | #633,137 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | ▲Top 100,000 | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 119,758 | ▲254,494 |
| Search visits a month, US | 20,680 | ▲106,848 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | ▲6,600 | 70 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | ▲36 | 33 |
| Referring domains | ▲3,147 | 393 |
| Backlinks | ▲30,865 | 2,014 |
| Domain registered | March 2023 | August 2023 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 0 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 1 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, AIGirlfriends.ai is there at #1; MiniApps.ai does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why AIGirlfriends.ai sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, AIGirlfriends.ai is the busier site: 254,494 search visits a month worldwide, about twice what MiniApps.ai gets (119,758). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 6,600 people a month type MiniApps.ai's name, against 70 for AIGirlfriends.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there MiniApps.ai comes out ahead (#103,285 against #633,137). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. In plain terms: AIGirlfriends.ai is both the bigger site and the one the category search points to.
What users say, and what I found
| Feature by feature | MiniApps.ai | AIGirlfriends.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Voice and calls | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Price and credits | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Content filter | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and safety | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Community and support | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice calls and messages | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| News feed | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Free trial | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Privacy, billing and legitimacy | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with AIGirlfriends.ai: 6 of its 10 features come out positive, against MiniApps.ai's 4 of 10, with 1 feature where the complaints win. AIGirlfriends.ai gets it on chat and roleplay, image generation and price and credits. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 2 points for AIGirlfriends.ai, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
AIGirlfriends.ai
#1 on the ranking
AIGirlfriends.ai does more, and does it well, than any site I tested at its price: voice calls that feel alive, generated video that keeps the likeness, realistic images, a deep character builder and a news feed that gives the companion a life between chats.
Read my full AIGirlfriends.ai analysis →More comparisons
- AiGirl.one vs AIGirlfriends.ai
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs OurDream.ai
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs HeraHaven
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs Kupid.ai
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs Juicy Chat
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs DreamGF
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs JOI
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs Candy AI
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs Fanfinity
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs FantasyGF
- AIGirlfriends.ai vs NextPart AI
- Angel.ai vs AIGirlfriends.ai
- Build your own →
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and AIGirlfriends.ai are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.