FantasyGF
#13 on the ranking
FantasyGF is a full-featured mid-market companion site that does a bit of everything and nothing memorably.
Read my full FantasyGF analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
HeraHaven leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
In short
| What they offer | ||
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | ▲Yes |
| Entry paid plan | Free | $19.95/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Filtered or limited |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users wanting a feature-rich free-entry NSFW girlfriend experience with voice and image generation | Users who prioritize high-quality image generation and emotionally deep chat over live voice stability |
| Not for | Users requiring a mobile app or needing cross-session memory on the free tier | Those who need reliable live voice calling or responsive customer support |
| Operator | Advanced AI Labs S.R.L. (company number 49734069, named in the site footer; the pricing grid is a near copy of DreamGF's, which is why the two get called sister sites, but the footer names a different Romanian company from DreamGF's DreamAI SRL) | Vilala Limited |
| Pricing notes | Free tier available, though it's more of a limited trial than a fully open plan. Paid plans run $12.99/month, roughly $9.99/month billed quarterly, or roughly $5.99/month billed annually (about $69.99/year), against a listed regular price of $25.99/month. Crypto accepted (BTC, ETH, USDT, USDC, LTC, SOL, MATIC). Note: fantasygf.ai now redirects to fantasygf.com. | 1 Month: $19.95. 12 Months: $79.80 (~$6.65/mo). Token purchases and cryptocurrency payments accepted. |
My take
Both give you a free tier, so you can try the chat on each before paying; expect message caps and few or no images until you upgrade. HeraHaven simply does more: immersive ai chat with memory, nsfw capability and image generation are on its list and not on FantasyGF's. More features is only better if you will use them. On adult content they are not the same product: FantasyGF allows it on paid plans, HeraHaven keeps a filter. Decide that first and half the comparison decides itself.
| The numbers | ||
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | ▲#13 | #42 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | #80 | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #726,988 | ▲#405,892 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | – | Top 500,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | 877 | ▲118,642 |
| Search visits a month, US | 600 | ▲29,751 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 1,300 | ▲5,400 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 51 | ▲52 |
| Referring domains | 1,283 | ▲2,446 |
| Backlinks | ▲42,101 | 19,209 |
| Domain registered | September 2023 | June 2024 |
| Public record I read | 3 videos, 3 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 3 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
Start with the row this site ranks on. When someone types "ai girlfriend" into Google in the US, FantasyGF is there at #80; HeraHaven does not appear in the tracked positions at all. That is why FantasyGF sits higher here even if it is the smaller site: it is the one the category sends newcomers to. On size, HeraHaven is the busier site: 118,642 search visits a month worldwide, more than 135 times what FantasyGF gets (877). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 5,400 people a month type HeraHaven's name, against 1,300 for FantasyGF. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. FantasyGF is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice. In plain terms: HeraHaven is bigger, FantasyGF is the one the category search points to.
| Feature by feature | ||
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Video | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice messages and calls | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users negativeMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Price and tokens | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Privacy and billing | Users mixedMy test: Disagree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Safety and legitimacy | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice messages and live calls | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Companion builder | – | Users positiveMy test: Partly disagree |
| Customer support | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
| Legitimacy and access | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with HeraHaven: 3 of its 10 features come out positive, against FantasyGF's 1 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. HeraHaven gets it on image generation and price and tokens. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 5 points for FantasyGF and 2 points for HeraHaven, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
FantasyGF
#13 on the ranking
FantasyGF is a full-featured mid-market companion site that does a bit of everything and nothing memorably.
Read my full FantasyGF analysis →HeraHaven
#42 on the ranking
HeraHaven makes the best images at the lowest annual price of any companion I have tested, and after a month with it I would still hesitate to recommend the company behind them.
Read my full HeraHaven analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. FantasyGF and HeraHaven are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.