MiniApps.ai
#31 on the ranking
MiniApps.ai is a prompt marketplace with a filter-free companion inside it, and after a month with it that is how I would judge it: by the calls, not the catalogue.
Read my full MiniApps.ai analysis →AI girlfriend sites side by side · Both tested first-hand · Data through September 2026
vs
MiniApps.ai vs Juicy Chat
I bought a membership on both and tested each for a month. What they offer, their measured numbers and what their users say, next to each other, with my verdict on each at the end.
The scoreboard
Juicy Chat leads on 2 of the 4 figures that decide most choices.
MiniApps.ai
Juicy ChatRank on this site#31▲#21
Google US, “ai girlfriend”––
Search visits a month▲120K34.7K
Name searches a month, US6.6K▲110K
In short
MiniApps.ai is the bigger site; here is what separates them.
- MiniApps.ai gets about 119,758 search visits a month worldwide against 34,745 for Juicy Chat, roughly 3.4 times as many (DataForSEO, September 2026).
- People search for Juicy Chat by name about 110,000 times a month in the US, against 6,600 for MiniApps.ai.
- MiniApps.ai has a free tier and paid plans from $9.99/mo; Juicy Chat has no free tier and starts at $12.99/mo.
What they offer
| What they offer |  MiniApps.ai |  Juicy Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Free tier | ▲Yes | No |
| Entry paid plan | $9.99/mo | $12.99/mo |
| Adult content | Allowed on paid plans | Allowed on paid plans |
| Features |
|
|
| Best for | Users seeking real-time NSFW voice and call interaction with a realistic mature AI companion | Users who prioritize emotionally responsive conversation and immersive voice messaging |
| Not for | Users preferring anime visuals or NSFW images, app-based access, a free trial, or crypto payment options | Those needing detailed image customization or reliable memory retention across long-term sessions |
| Operator | Not disclosed on the site or in the press I read; it was launched by an individual developer on r/ChatGPT in 2023 and the site lists only a contact email | Cognify AI Ltd (UK Companies House, incorporated 3 March 2025); some listings name DAWNECXE Innovation Pte. Ltd in Singapore |
| Pricing notes | A free tier now exists (100 credits/day). Paid monthly: $9.99, $39.00, confirmed still accurate. A yearly plan (~26% discount, exact price not published) has also been added since original testing. No crypto payments. | 1 Month: $12.99. 3 Months: $38.97. 12 Months: $93.99. Coin system for messaging. Up to 32% discounts on longer-term commitments. |
My take
If you want to try before you pay, MiniApps.ai lets you: Juicy Chat asks for a card first. A free tier is a sampler, not a plan, but it tells you whether the chat suits you before money moves. MiniApps.ai is the cheaper way in at $9.99/mo against $12.99/mo for Juicy Chat. The entry price is only part of it: image, voice and video are often metered on top, so the pricing notes row matters as much as the headline.
The numbers
| The numbers | MiniApps.ai | Juicy Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Rank on this siteOn the combined data gathered for every site | #31 | ▲#21 |
| Google US rank, “ai girlfriend”DataForSEO ranked keywords, September 2026 | – | – |
| Tranco rank, all domainsAll-traffic rank among the top million domains | #103,285 | ▲#41,057 |
| Chrome UX tierGoogle Chrome UX Report | Top 100,000 | ▲Top 50,000 |
| Search visits a month, worldwideDataForSEO estimate | ▲119,758 | 34,745 |
| Search visits a month, US | ▲20,680 | 10,169 |
| Brand searches a month, USGoogle Ads data via DataForSEO | 6,600 | ▲110,000 |
| Domain RatingDomain Rating by Ahrefs, out of 100 | 36 | ▲48 |
| Referring domains | ▲3,147 | 1,205 |
| Backlinks | 30,865 | ▲1,357,607 |
| Domain registered | March 2023 | May 2024 |
| Public record I read | 1 videos, 2 Reddit threads, 0 articles | 8 videos, 7 Reddit threads, 4 articles |
The better value in each row is marked in green. Search visits and brand searches are DataForSEO estimates; Tranco and Chrome UX tiers are ranks, not visit counts.
My take
None of these ranks in the tracked positions for "ai girlfriend", so their places on this site come from all-traffic rank, and their visitors arrive by name, by ads or from app stores rather than from the category search. On size, MiniApps.ai is the busier site: 119,758 search visits a month worldwide, about three times what Juicy Chat gets (34,745). These are estimates of visits from Google only, so a site with apps or ads can be bigger than this shows. Brand searches are the loyalty line: 110,000 people a month type Juicy Chat's name, against 6,600 for MiniApps.ai. A name people type on purpose is a site they come back to; a site with lots of visits and few brand searches is living on rankings it could lose. Tranco tells a slightly different story: it counts every visit, not only search, and there Juicy Chat comes out ahead (#41,057 against #103,285). When search and all-traffic disagree, the site that wins on Tranco has an audience that does not come through Google. MiniApps.ai is the older domain (2023 against 2024), which counts for something in a category where sites close without notice.
What users say, and what I found
| Feature by feature | MiniApps.ai | Juicy Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Chat and roleplay | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Memory | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree | Users negativeMy test: Disagree |
| Image generation | Users mixedMy test: Agree | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Voice and calls | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Characters and customisation | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Free tier | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Price and credits | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Content filter | Users positiveMy test: Agree | – |
| Privacy and safety | Users negativeMy test: Partly disagree | – |
| Community and support | Users mixedMy test: Agree | – |
| Voice | – | Users positiveMy test: Agree |
| Characters and creator library | – | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Free tier and message cap | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Price and coins | – | Users mixedMy test: Partly disagree |
| Privacy and billing | – | Users mixedMy test: Disagree |
| Safety, age and legitimacy | – | Users mixedMy test: Agree |
| Support | – | Users negativeMy test: Agree |
“Users” is the balance of the YouTube reviews, Reddit threads and articles read for each brand page; “my test” is whether my own month on the site agreed with them.
My take
Users are happier with MiniApps.ai: 4 of its 10 features come out positive, against Juicy Chat's 1 of 10, with 2 features where the complaints win. My own month did not always match the crowd: I disagreed with users on 2 points for MiniApps.ai and 4 points for Juicy Chat, and each disagreement is spelled out on the brand page.
My verdict on each
Juicy Chat
#21 on the ranking
JuicyChat is the biggest uncensored character library I have used, with the best voice replies at its price, and a reputation that was mostly paid for.
Read my full Juicy Chat analysis →More comparisons
Written by Hunter Gray, Founder, Owner & Writer. Every figure is from the two brand pages and refreshes monthly. MiniApps.ai and Juicy Chat are two of the sites in my best AI girlfriend ranking, where the whole category is ordered on the same data.